29 U.S.C. § 10
An employer may enter into an agreement with an educational institution that has been approved for the enrollment of veterans under chapter 34 of title 38, United States Code, in order that such institution may provide a program of job training (or a portion of such a program) under this Act. When such an agreement has been entered into, the application of the employer under section 7 shall so state and shall include a description of the training to be provided under the agreement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1949–2014 · leading case: Maverick Transp., LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 739 F.3d 1149 (8th Cir. 2014).
Maverick Transp., LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 739 F.3d 1149 (8th Cir. 2014). “For example, § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 10 (b), provides that “no complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge.”
Roubik v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 692 N.E.2d 1167 (Ill. 1998). “2d at 9929 U.S.C. § 10 (1994); 710 ILCS 5/12 (West 1996).”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnesium Casting Co., United Steelworkers of Am., Intervenor, 427 F.2d 114 (1st Cir. 1970). “14 ; 29 U.S.C. § 10 (d). In the case presently before us, the Regional Director’s findings of fact which had been adopted by the trial examiner and by the Board were as complete and “reviewable” as any we have received from the Board.”
E. Coal Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 176 F.2d 131 (4th Cir. 1949). “d that so far as practicable, the Board’s hearings should be conducted in accordance with the rules of evidence applicable in the District Courts of the United States; and section 10(c) was amended so as to require the Board’s decisions to be supported by “preponderance of the…”
Title Guarantee Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 407 F. Supp. 498 (S.D.N.Y. 1975). “Bannercraft was specifically limited by the Court to negotiation situations where discussions could reasonably continue while an action was pending in litigation.”
Kobell v. Suburban Lines, Inc., 731 F.2d 1076 (3rd Cir. 1984). “Preliminary Statement This case arises under section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 10® (1976), which enables the National Labor Relations Board or its designated agent to seek interim injunctive relief from a federal district court pending the Board’s…”
Washington v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 103 F. Supp. 2d 517 (N.D.N.Y. 2000). “(Defendant cited this statute incorrectly, as “29 U.S.C. § 10(b)” (see Def.’s Summ. J. Mem.”
Ledford ex rel. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mining Specialists, Inc., 865 F. Supp. 314 (S.D.W. Va 1993). “2d at 476 ; 29 U.S.C. § 10 (e). The court noted, however, in relying on case law arising under § 10(e), that the standards for temporary relief are the same under both sections.”
Teamsters Local Union No. 5 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 406 F.2d 439 (5th Cir. 1969). “The parties seek relief pursuant to respective rights under Section 10(e) and (f), 29 U.S.C. §§ 10 (e) and (f). The Board adopted the Trial Examiner’s decision and recommended order as its own.”
Maverick Transp., LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Labor (8th Cir. 2014). “For example, § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 10 (b), provides that “no complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge.”
Overstreet v. Tucson Ready Mix, Inc., 11 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (D. Ariz. 1998). “STANDARD FOR RELIEF UNDER 29 U.S.C. § 10 (j) This proceeding is ancillary to the NLRB’s administrative proceeding.”
Sam v. Creare, Inc. (D.N.H. 1993). “29 U.S.C. § 10 0 1 (b). "In addition to comprehensively regulating certain employees welfare benefit plans, ERISA specifically preempts most state laws that 'relate to' plans covered under ERISA.”
— 29 U.S.C. § 10(b) — 1 case
Washington v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 103 F. Supp. 2d 517 (N.D.N.Y. 2000). “(Defendant cited this statute incorrectly, as “29 U.S.C. § 10(b)” (see Def.’s Summ. J. Mem.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.