29 U.S.C. § 110
Review by court of appeals of issuance or denial of temporary injunctions; record
Whenever any court of the United States shall issue or deny any temporary injunction in a case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, the court shall, upon the request of any party to the proceedings and on his filing the usual bond for costs, forthwith certify as in ordinary cases the record of the case to the court of appeals for its review. Upon the filing of such record in the court of appeals, the appeal shall be heard and the temporary injunctive order affirmed, modified, or set aside expeditiously 1
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1947–2019 · leading case: Atlas Air, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of, 928 F.3d 1102 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
Atlas Air, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of, 928 F.3d 1102 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “§ 1292 (a)(1) and 29 U.S.C. § 110 . II We begin by asking whether the district court had jurisdiction to issue this type of preliminary injunction.”
Kim Reuter v. Bob Skipper, 4 F.3d 716 (9th Cir. 1993). “We have jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 110 . We affirm the district court’s grant of the preliminary injunction.”
Oil, Chem. & Atomic Workers Int'l Union, Afl-Cio, Local 2-286 v. Amoco Oil Co. (Salt Lake City Refinery), 885 F.2d 697 (10th Cir. 1989). “29 U.S.C. § 110 (emphasis added). . Because we have adopted a modified interpretation of the “likelihood of success on the merits" requirement, holding that "it will ordinarily be enough that the plaintiff has raised questions going to the merits so serious, substantial, diffi…”
Bakery Sales Drivers Local Union No. 33 v. Wagshal, 333 U.S. 437 (1948). “70 , 72, 29 U. S. C. § 110 , provides for immediate review of an order granting or denying “any temporary injunction in a case involving or growing out of a labor dispute .”
Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. E. Air Lines, Inc., 121 B.R. 428 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “Norris LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C. § 110 (1988). 8 .IAM has withdrawn its request for further briefing were this standard of review to be invoked.”
Local 13, Int'l Fed'n of Prof'l & Technical Engineers, Afl-Cio v. Gen. Elec. Co., 531 F.2d 1178 (3d Cir. 1976). “On August 14, 1975, a panel of this Court granted GE’s motion for an expedited hearing on the appeal pursuant to Section 10 of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C. § 110 . The expedited appeal is that now at bar.”
Trinidad Corp. v. Dist. No. 1-Pac. Coast Dist., 723 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “See 29 U.S.C. § 110 (“the appeal shall be heard and the temporary injunctive order affirmed, modified, or set aside with the greatest possible expedition, giving the proceedings precedence over all other matters except older matters of the same character”).”
Charles D. Bonanno Linen Serv., Inc. v. William J. McCarthy, 532 F.2d 189 (1st Cir. 1976). “* This court’s jurisdiction is premised upon 29 U.S.C. § 110 , which allows appeals of temporary injunctions but not temporary restraining orders.”
Int'l Union v. Dana Corp., 679 F.2d 634 (6th Cir. 1982). “§ 1292 (a)(1) and 29 U.S.C. § 110 , of a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction which were entered pending arbitration of Dana’s alleged breach of a neutrality agreement with the United Automobile Workers.”
Roadway Express, Inc. v. Teamsters Local 515, 642 F. Supp. 116 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “29 U.S.C. § 110 . Finally, the Supreme Court stated that where the collective bargaining agreement contains an arbitration clause, there is a presumption of arbitrability.”
Alesna v. Rice, 69 F. Supp. 897 (D. Haw. 1947). “29 U.S.C.A. § 110 provides for appeals from the granting or denial of a preliminary injunction to the Circuit Court of Appeals, which in this instance would be the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.”
Ry. Labor Executives Ass'n v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co., 914 F.2d 53 (4th Cir. 1990). “On May 25, 1990, the district court denied the Unions’ request for stay pending appeal, but it certified the record to this court for expedited review of the propriety of the *55 preliminary injunction under § 10 of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.