Notes of Decisions
Cited in
20
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 2012–2026 · leading case:
Cyril Korte v. HHS, 735 F.3d 654 (7th Cir. 2013).
Cyril Korte v. HHS, 735 F.3d 654 (7th Cir. 2013).
· cites it 3× “§ 300gg-13(a); see also 29 U.S.C. § 1185d. Before promulgating regulations pursuant to this statutory directive, the HRSA sought advice from the Institute of Medicine at the National Academy of Science about what services to include in the preventive-care mandate.”
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 723 F.3d 1114 (10th Cir. 2013).
· cites it 2× “§ 300gg-13; 29 U.S.C. § 1185d. One provision mandates coverage, without cost-sharing by plan participants or beneficiaries, of “preventive care and screenings” for women “as provided for in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration…”
Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Inc. v. Sebelius, 988 F. Supp. 2d 958 (N.D. Ind. 2013).
“§ 300gg-13; 29 U.S.C. § 1185d. One provision mandates coverage, without cost-sharing by plan participants or beneficiaries, of “preventive care and screenings” for women “as provided for in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health *961 Resources and Services…”
Schs. v. Sebelius, 988 F. Supp. 2d 935 (N.D. Ind. 2013).
“§ 300gg-13; 29 U.S.C. § 1185d. One provision mandates coverage, without cost-sharing by plan participants or beneficia *940 ríes, of “preventive care and screenings” for women “as provided for in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services…”
Diocese of Cheyenne v. Sebelius, 21 F. Supp. 3d 1215 (D. Wyo. 2014).
“§ 300gg-13; 29 U.S.C. § 1185d). The provision of the ACA at issue here “mandates coverage, without cost-sharing by plan participants or beneficiaries, of ‘preventive care and screenings’ for women ‘as provided for in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and…”
King v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Illinois, 104 F. Supp. 3d 1062 (S.D. Cal. 2015).
· cites it 4× “Internal Revenue Code § 9815 is substantively identical to ERISA § 715 (29 U.S.C. § 1185d). . See 999 F.Supp.2d at 1184 ("The parties here agree that the Plan gives Aetna discretionary authority to interpret the plan’s provisions and determine factual matters of eligibility.”
Hudson Hosp. Opco, LLC v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. Co. (D.N.J. 2023).
“8 Plaintiffs allege that the ACA’s cost-sharing requirements “are expressly incorporated into group health plans covered by ERISA,” citing 29 U.S.C. § 1185d(a). (Am. Compl. ¶ 52). Defendants do not contest this allegation.”
— 29 U.S.C. § 1185d(a) — 3 cases
Hudson Hosp. Opco, LLC v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. Co. (D.N.J. 2023).
“8 Plaintiffs allege that the ACA’s cost-sharing requirements “are expressly incorporated into group health plans covered by ERISA,” citing 29 U.S.C. § 1185d(a). (Am. Compl. ¶ 52). Defendants do not contest this allegation.”
— 29 U.S.C. § 1185d(a)(1) — 6 cases
— 29 U.S.C. § 1185d(a)(2) — 1 case
King v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Illinois, 104 F. Supp. 3d 1062 (S.D. Cal. 2015).
“Internal Revenue Code § 9815 is substantively identical to ERISA § 715 (29 U.S.C. § 1185d). . See 999 F.Supp.2d at 1184 ("The parties here agree that the Plan gives Aetna discretionary authority to interpret the plan’s provisions and determine factual matters of eligibility.”
— 29 U.S.C. § 1185d(a)(l) — 1 case
King v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Illinois, 104 F. Supp. 3d 1062 (S.D. Cal. 2015).
“Internal Revenue Code § 9815 is substantively identical to ERISA § 715 (29 U.S.C. § 1185d). . See 999 F.Supp.2d at 1184 ("The parties here agree that the Plan gives Aetna discretionary authority to interpret the plan’s provisions and determine factual matters of eligibility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.