29 U.S.C. § 13
Powers and duties of bureau
It shall be the duty of the Women’s Bureau to formulate standards and policies which shall promote the welfare of wage-earning women, improve their working conditions, increase their efficiency, and advance their opportunities for profitable employment. The said bureau shall have authority to investigate and report to the Department of Labor upon all matters pertaining to the welfare of women in industry. The director of said bureau may from time to time publish the results of these investigations in such a manner and to such extent as the Secretary of Labor may prescribe.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1968–2023 · leading case: Chen v. Major League Baseball Props., Inc., 798 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2015).
Chen v. Major League Baseball Props., Inc., 798 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2015). “3d at 1192-93 (finding that where ski areas were separated by six miles “issues of business integration are not dispositive in determining whether establishments are separate” for purposes of amusement or recreational establishment under 29 U.S.C. § 13 (b)(29)); Mitchell v.…”
Chen v. Major League Baseball, 6 F. Supp. 3d 449 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). “The regulations relevant to the "amusement or recreational establishment” exemption were not promulgated pursuant to an express delegation of rulemaking authority by congress, see 29 U.S.C. § 13 (a)(3); cf. English v. Ecolab, Inc.”
Wirtz v. Campus Chefs, Inc., 303 F. Supp. 1112 (N.D. Ga. 1968). “§ 213 (a) (20) (1961) and 29 U.S.C.A. § 13 (b) (18) (1966), employees of a retail or service establishment employed primarily in connection with the preparation or offering of food or beverages for human consumption.”
Reich v. Gateway Press, Inc., 13 F.3d 685 (3d Cir. 1994). “” 29 U.S.C. § 13 (a)(1). The Department of Labor (“DOL”) regulations outline three types of professionals: “learned,” “artistic,” and “teachers.”
Barron v. Lee Enter., Inc., 183 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (C.D. Ill. 2002). “” 29 U.S.C. § 13 (a)(1); Piscione , 171 F.3d at *1085 533.”
James D. Hodgson v. Odus Wittenburg, 464 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1972). “29 U.S.C. § 13 (a)(6) (A). The judgment is reversed and remanded with further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Xia v. New Yung Wah Carrier LLC, No. 1:21-cv-04475 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2023). “Zheng further states that Plaintiffs are covered by the Motor Carrier Exemption to the overtime rules pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 13 (b)(1) because they were involved in making interstate deliveries.”
Louis-Charles v. Sun-Sentinel Co., 595 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (S.D. Fla. 2008). “See, 29 U.S.C. §§ 13 (a)(1), 13(b)(10)(a), (17); 29 C.”
Chen v. Major League Baseball Props., Inc., No. 14-1315-cv (2d Cir. Aug. 14, 2015). “3d at 1192–93 (finding that where ski areas 6 were separated by six miles “issues of business integration are not dispositive in 7 determining whether establishments are separate” for purposes of amusement or 8 recreational establishment under 29 U.S.C. § 13 (b)(29)); Mitchell…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.