29 U.S.C. § 1396
Special rules for plans under section 404(c) of title 26
Section 1423 of this title, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(B)(ii), (2)(C), was repealed by Pub. L. 113–235, div. O, title I, § 108(a)(1),
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1986–2019 · leading case: Cent. States, Se. & Sw. Areas Pension Fund v. Burton Slotky, 956 F.2d 1369 (7th Cir. 1992).
Cent. States, Se. & Sw. Areas Pension Fund v. Burton Slotky, 956 F.2d 1369 (7th Cir. 1992). “, require that when an employer withdraws from a multiemployer pension plan governed by ERISA, the plan assess a withdrawal liability against him, 29 U.S.C. § 1396 , so that the financial burden of his employees’ vested pension benefits will not be shifted to the other employers…”
Bd. of Trs. of the IBT Local 863 Pension Fund v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc., 802 F.3d 534 (3rd Cir. 2015). “, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1396 (a)(1), 1425(f), & 1426(c)(2).”
United Food & Com. Workers Union v. Progressive Supermarkets, 644 F. Supp. 633 (D.N.J. 1986). “Progressive proceeded to request, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1396 (a)(1) (1985), that the Fund recompute the withdrawal liability because of various alleged errors.”
Trs. of the Suburban Teamsters of N. Ill. Pension Fund v. E Co., 914 F.3d 1037 (7th Cir. 2019). “See 29 U.S.C. § 1396 . Withdrawal liability, as its name implies, is designed to prevent shifting the financial burden of employees' vested pension benefits to other employers in the multi-employer plan.”
Cent. States, Se. & Sw. Areas Pension Fund v. Progressive Driver Servs., Inc., 940 F. Supp. 1311 (N.D. Ill. 1996). “, require that when an employer withdraws from a multiemployer pension plan governed by ERISA, the plan assesses a withdrawal liability against him, 29 U.S.C. § 1396 , so that the financial burden of his employees’ vested pension benefits will not be shifted to the other…”
Trs. of the Suburban Teams v. The E Co. (7th Cir. 2019). “See 29 U.S.C. § 1396 . Withdrawal liability, as its name implies, is designed to prevent shifting the financial burden No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.