29 U.S.C. § 1851

Criminal sanctions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Violations of chapter or regulations

Any person who willfully and knowingly violates this chapter or any regulation under this chapter shall be fined not more than $1,000 or sentenced to prison for a term not to exceed one year, or both. Upon conviction for any subsequent violation of this chapter or any regulation under this chapter, the defendant shall be fined not more than $10,000 or sentenced to prison for a term not to exceed three years, or both.

(b) Violations of section 1324a(a) of title 8

If a farm labor contractor who commits a violation of paragraph (1) or (2) of section 1324a(a) of title 8 has been refused issuance or renewal of, or has failed to obtain, a certificate of registration or is a farm labor contractor whose certificate has been suspended or revoked, the contractor shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000 or sentenced to prison for a term not to exceed three years, or both.

(Pub. L. 97–470, title V, § 501, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2596; Pub. L. 99–603, title I, § 101(b)(1)(D), Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3372.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1986—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–603 substituted “paragraph (1) or (2) of section 1324a(a) of title 8” for “section 1816 of this title”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–603 applicable to employment, recruitment, referral, or utilization of services of an individual occurring on or after first day of seventh month beginning after Nov. 6, 1986, see section 101(b)(2) of Pub. L. 99–603, as amended, set out as a note under section 1802 of this title.

Effective Date

Section effective 90 days from Jan. 14, 1983, see section 524 of Pub. L. 97–470, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1982–2018 · leading case: Alaska Airlines v. Judy Schurke, 898 F.3d 904 (9th Cir. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Alaska Airlines v. Judy Schurke, 898 F.3d 904 (9th Cir. 2018). “§§ 151–65, 181–88, when the worker’s underlying right to vacation leave is covered by a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”). We conclude that it is not.”

Sotelo, 23 I. & N. Dec. 201 (BIA 2001). “V 1999) and 29 U.S.C. § 1851 (1994); and illegal entry or aiding and abetting illegal entry, in violation of 8 U.”

Garth Conlan v. United States Dep't of Labor, 76 F.3d 271 (9th Cir. 1996). “For example, the MSPA’s criminal enforcement provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1851 (a), requires a showing that a person “willfully and knowingly” violated the Act before criminal penalties will be imposed.”

Holmes v. McKay, 513 S.E.2d 851 (S.C. Ct. App. 1999). “29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1851 , 1854 (West 1999). 2 .”

Perez v. Blue Mountain Farms, 961 F. Supp. 2d 1164 (E.D. Wash. 2013). “Violations of the MSPA can give rise to criminal sanctions, 29 U.S.C. § 1851 , or injunctive relief, 29 U.”

McLaughlin v. Elsberry, Inc., 868 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1988). “However, in order to rise to the level of a violation of the MWPA, which may subject the offender to criminal penalties, 29 U.S.C. § 1851 , the resistance must be unlawful.”

Heheman v. E. W. Scripps Co., 668 F.2d 878 (6th Cir. 1982). “Scripps Company and The Cincinnati Enquirer under the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1851 et seq., claiming breach of their Collective Bargaining Agreement (C.”

Phillip D. Bertelsen, Inc. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2081 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “(See 29 U.S.C. § 1851 (a). 6 ) A. Availability for Work.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.