Notes of Decisions
Llacua v. W. Range Ass'n, 930 F.3d 1161 (10th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 2× “See 29 U.S.C. §§ 1802 , 1821, 1822 ; 20 C.F.R.”
Malacara v. Garber, 353 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 2003).
“” 29 U.S.C. § 1802 (6). If a non-family member performs any labor contracting activity, that “spoils” an agricultural employer’s claim to the exemption.”
Charles v. Burton, 169 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 1999).
· cites it 6× “203(1); 29 U.S.C. § 1802 (2). An entity "employs" a person under the AWPA and the FLSA if it "suffers or permits" the individual to work.”
Dagoberto Morante-Navarro v. T&Y Pine Straw, Inc., 350 F.3d 1163 (11th Cir. 2003).
· cites it 4× “29 U.S.C. § 1802 (3). Thus, the AWPA encompasses three possible definitions for agricultural employment: (1) employment within the provisions of section 3(f) of the FLSA, 29 U.”
Rodriguez Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Berrybrook Farms, Inc., 672 F. Supp. 1009 (W.D. Mich. 1987).
· cites it 4× “Defendants argue that they are excluded under 29 U.S.C. § 1802 (7) which excludes agricultural employers, agricultural associations or their employees from its definition of farm labor contractors.”
Escobar v. Baker, 814 F. Supp. 1491 (W.D. Wash. 1993).
· cites it 6× “29 U.S.C. § 1802 (7). The term “farm labor contracting activity” means “recruiting, soliciting, hiring, employing, furnishing, or transporting any migrant or seasonal agricultural worker.”
Castillo v. Case Farms of Ohio, Inc., 96 F. Supp. 2d 578 (W.D. Tex. 1999).
· cites it 5× “29 U.S.C. § 1802 (6). Case Farms clearly provided ATC valuable consideration, in the form of $8.”
Caro-Galvan v. Curtis Richardson, Inc., 993 F.2d 1500 (11th Cir. 1993).
· cites it 8× “” 29 U.S.C. § 1802 (8)(A). We believe that, based on the evidence presented during appellants’ case in chief, appellants satisfy both elements.”
In Re Margarito Reyes, 814 F.2d 168 (5th Cir. 1987).
· cites it 2× “The statute covers “an individual” employed in agricultural work, AWPA, 29 U.S.C. § 1802 (8)(A), unless the aliens involved are in that class of aliens referred to as “H-2” workers, as defined under 8 U.”
Soto v. McLean, 20 F. Supp. 2d 901 (E.D.N.C. 1998).
· cites it 8× “29 U.S.C. § 1802 (8)(A). Defendants argue that plaintiffs were not required to be absent overnight from their permanent place of residence while employed by defendants.”
Avila v. A. Sam & Sons, 856 F. Supp. 763 (W.D.N.Y. 1994).
· cites it 5× “29 U.S.C. § 1802 (3). A. Migrant Worker Status Section 1802(8) (A) of the AWPA defines “migrant agricultural worker” as “an individual who is employed in agricultural employment of a seasonal or other temporary nature, and who is required to be absent overnight from his…”
— 29 U.S.C. § 1802(2) — 1 case
— 29 U.S.C. § 1802(6) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.