29 U.S.C. § 677

Separability

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

If any provision of this chapter, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1974–1974 · leading case: Columbus Coated Fabrics, a Div. of Borden Chem. Co., & Borden, Inc. v. The Indus. Comm'n of Ohio, 498 F.2d 408 (6th Cir. 1974).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Columbus Coated Fabrics, a Div. of Borden Chem. Co., & Borden, Inc. v. The Indus. Comm'n of Ohio, 498 F.2d 408 (6th Cir. 1974). “We must await a final order of the District Court, entered properly under Rule 58, before we may address the merits of this case. We remand this case for entry of an order by the District Court.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.