29 U.S.C. § 713

Transfer of funds

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no funds appropriated under this chapter for any program or activity may be used for any purpose other than that for which the funds were specifically authorized.(b) No more than 1 percent of funds appropriated for discretionary grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements authorized by this chapter may be used for the purpose of providing non-Federal panels of experts to review applications for such grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements.(Pub. L. 93–112, § 16, formerly § 14, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, § 403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1113; renumbered § 16, Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, § 101(f) [title VIII, § 402(a)(1)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–412.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 715 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220.

A prior section 713, Pub. L. 93–112, § 14, as added Pub. L. 95–602, title I, § 122(a)(10), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2986; amended Pub. L. 98–221, title I, § 103, Feb. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 17; Pub. L. 99–506, title I, §§ 103(d)(2)(C), 106, title X, § 1001(a)(5), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1810, 1812, 1841; Pub. L. 100–630, title II, § 201(f), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3304; Pub. L. 102–569, title I, §§ 102(p)(5), 107, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4356, 4362, related to program and project evaluation, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, § 403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1093. See section 711 of this title.

A prior section 16 of Pub. L. 93–112 was renumbered section 18 and is classified to section 715 of this title.

Another prior section 16 of Pub. L. 93–112 was classified to section 715 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1982–2012 · leading case: Howell v. Gray, 843 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D.D.C. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Howell v. Gray, 843 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D.D.C. 2012). “The RSA receives federal funding to provide authorized vocational rehabilitation services pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 713 (a). Takahashi v. D.C. Dept.”

Takahashi v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Human Servs., 952 A.2d 869 (D.C. 2008). “RSA receives federal funding to provide authorized vocational rehabilitation services pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 713 (a). Under the Rehabilitation Act, RSA is authorized to use federal funds for: (1) the provision of assessment and evaluations necessary to…”

Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers v. Gen. Elec. Co., 539 F. Supp. 520 (W.D. Ark. 1982). “See § 203 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 713 (d). Accordingly, a grievance arising under a collective bargaining agreement providing for arbitration must be deemed arbitrable “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.