U.S. Code » Title 29 » Chapter CHAPTER 16— VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND OTHER REHABILITATION SERVICES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER V— RIGHTS AND ADVOCACY

29 U.S.C. § 790

Repealed. Pub. L. 102–569, title V, § 502(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4424

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 100 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1976–2023 · leading case: Cheryl M. Hooven-Lewis v. Louis Caldera, Sec'y of the Army, 249 F.3d 259 (4th Cir. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cheryl M. Hooven-Lewis v. Louis Caldera, Sec'y of the Army, 249 F.3d 259 (4th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs Amended Complaint asserted 1) disability discrimination in violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 790 et seq.; 2) retaliation for engaging in protected EEO activity, in violation of the Rehabilitation Act; 3) retaliation in violation of the Whistleblower…”
Regents of the Univ. of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978). · cites it 2× “2d 1277, 1284-1287 (CA7 1977) (Title V of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U. S. C. § 790 et seq. (1976 ed.)); Piascik v.”
Wisconsin Cmty. Servs., Inc. v. City of Milwaukee, 465 F.3d 737 (7th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2× “§ 12201 (“Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to apply a lesser standard than the standards applied under title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( 29 U.S.C. § 790 et seq.) or the regulations issued by Federal agencies…”
United States Dep't of Transp. v. Paralyzed Vets. of Am., 477 U.S. 597 (1986). · cites it 2× “390 , as amended; 29 U. S. C. § 790 et seq. (1982 ed. and Supp.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n, & Judith Keane, Intervening v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 417 F.3d 789 (7th Cir. 2005). “Congress expressly provided that these regulations would be of continuing importance in interpreting the ADA: Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to apply a lesser standard *799 than the standards applied under title V of the…”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Chevron Phillips Chem. Co., 570 F.3d 606 (5th Cir. 2009). “These regulations are particularly important because Congress relied heavily on The Rehabilitation Act in drafting the ADA and even specified that, "[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this chapter, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to apply a lesser standard than the…”
Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Mgmt., Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care Centre, 97 F.3d 876 (6th Cir. 1996). “8 On May 24, 1994, plaintiff filed the complaint below, alleging violations of the ADA; the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 790 , et seq.; the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.”
Cris D'Angelo v. Conagra Foods, Inc., 422 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2005). “In this case, Congress did more than suggest this construction; it adopted a specific statutory provision in the ADA directing as follows: “Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to apply a lesser standard than the standards…”
Peninsula Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Adkins, 137 A.3d 211 (Md. 2016). “Although Title VII did not encompass disability within its scope, Congress thereafter extended Title VII’s ban of discriminatory workplace practices to include disability with its enactment of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.”
Lee v. City of Columbus, Ohio, 636 F.3d 245 (6th Cir. 2011). “07 § 111(H)(1)(c) violates the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 790 et seq. (“Rehabilitation Act”) and the privacy provisions of the First, Fifth and Fourteen Amendments to the Constitution of the United States through 42 U.”
Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc., 180 F.3d 1154 (10th Cir. 1999). “Moreover, elsewhere in the ADA, Congress provided that: Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to apply a lesser standard than the standards applied under title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( 29 U.S.C. § 790 et seq.) or…”
Hubbard v. Twin Oaks Health & Rehab. Ctr., 408 F. Supp. 2d 923 (E.D. Cal. 2004). · cites it 2× “, and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (“Rehab Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 790 et seq. This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment.”
Show all 100 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.