30 U.S.C. § 124

Agricultural entry or purchase of lands withdrawn or classified as containing sodium or sulphur

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 30 CasesGoogle Scholar

Lands withdrawn, classified, or reported as valuable for sodium and/or sulphur and subject to prospecting, leasing, or development under the General Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, or Acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto [30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.], shall be subject to appropriation, location, selection, entry, or purchase if otherwise available in the form and manner and subject to the reservations, provisions, limitations, and conditions of the Act of Congress approved July 17, 1914 (38 Stat. L. 509; U.S.C., title 30, sec. 123); Provided, however, That lands lying within the geologic structure of a field, or withdrawn, classified, or reported as valuable for any of the minerals named herein and/or in any of said sections, or upon which leases or prospecting permits have been applied for or granted, for the production of any of such minerals, shall not be subject to such appropriation, location, selection, entry, or purchase unless it shall be determined by the Secretary of the Interior that such disposal will not unreasonably interfere with operations under said sections.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1954–1998 · leading case: Joe Aulston & Lola Aulston v. United States of Am., & Shell W. E & P, Intervenors-Appellees, 915 F.2d 584 (10th Cir. 1990).
Joe Aulston & Lola Aulston v. United States of Am., & Shell W. E & P, Intervenors-Appellees, 915 F.2d 584 (10th Cir. 1990). “1570 (codified at 30 U.S.C. § 124 (1988)). 4 . Intervenors assert that this action is time-barred under the statute of limitations contained in 30 U.”
West Coast Expl. Co. v. McKay Sec'y of Interior, 213 F.2d 582 (D.C. Cir. 1954). “1570 , 30 U.S.C.A. § 124 , 6 authorized the disposal under the non-min *587 eral public land laws of lands withdrawn or classified as valuable for phosphate, nitrate, potash, oil, gas, asphaltic or sodium minerals, the supplementing Act of March 4, 1933 provides that lands…”
S. Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Prod. Co., 151 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 1998). “The House report and the subsequently enacted 1933 Act, which consolidated in the United States ownership of commingled sodium and potash, 30 U.S.C. § 124 , do not particularly inform us about the 1909 and 1910 coal reservations, and certainly do not persuade us to ignore our…”
S. Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Prod. Co., 119 F.3d 816 (10th Cir. 1997). “The House report and the subsequently enacted 1933 Act, which consolidated in the United States ownership of commingled sodium and potash, 30 U.S.C. § 124 , do not particularly inform us about the 1909 and 1910 coal reservations, and certainly do not persuade us to ignore our…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.