30 U.S.C. § 28a
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1934–1965 · leading case: S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, & Aurora Nickel Co., a Corp. v. E. Miles Flynn, 230 F.2d 695 (9th Cir. 1956).
S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, & Aurora Nickel Co., a Corp. v. E. Miles Flynn, 230 F.2d 695 (9th Cir. 1956). “221, Public Law 107, 30 U.S.C.A. § 28a note. It suspended the requirement until July 1, 1949.”
Morgan v. Sorenson, 286 P.2d 229 (Utah 1955). “The obvious purpose of the law is to exact work as an evidence of good faith on the part of the owner, and also to discourage the holding of mining claims without development or intention to develop, to the exclusion of others who could and would improve such ground if they had…”
In re Suncrest Packers, Inc., 8 F. Supp. 917 (D. Nev. 1934). “) “That as trustee of said Bankrupt he desires to hold said mining claims' during the assessment year 1932 to 1933 under the provisions of the Act of Congress entitled ‘An Act providing for the suspension of annual assessment work on mining claims held by location in the United…”
Bunker Chance Mining Co. v. Bex, 408 P.2d 170 (Idaho 1965). “74 (1943), 30 U.S. C. § 28a. There the notice of intention to hold was filed late as in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.