30 U.S.C. § 28i
Failure to pay
Failure to pay the claim maintenance fee or the location fee as required by sections 28f to 28l of this title shall conclusively constitute a forfeiture of the unpatented mining claim, mill or tunnel site by the claimant and the claim shall be deemed null and void by operation of law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1996–2017 · leading case: Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 77 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 77 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “Plaintiff, however, argues that the voluntary payment doctrine does not apply because, unlike the payment fa Edmonston, its payments to the BLM were the product of coercion.”
Charles R. Kunkes & Marguerite v. Kunkes v. United States, 78 F.3d 1549 (Fed. Cir. 1996). “” 30 U.S.C. § 28i. Between 1969 and 1992, appellants located and filed 573 unpatented claims to minerals beneath public lands in Mohave County, Arizona.”
Majuba Mining, Ltd. v. Pumpkin Copper, Inc., 299 P.3d 363 (Nev. 2013). “30 U.S.C. § 28i (2006) (“Failure to pay the claim maintenance fee .”
Miller v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 635 F. Supp. 2d 1224 (D. Colo. 2009). “]” 30 U.S.C. § 28i then denotes the consequences for failure to pay the fee: Failure to pay the claim maintenance fee or the location fee as required by sections 28f to 28k of this title shall conclusively constitute a forfeiture of the unpatented mining claim, mill or tunnel…”
Saltzman v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2014). “30 U.S.C. § 28i. Since 1993, Congress has amended the maintenance fee statute multiple times.”
Miller v. Us Dept. of Interior, 635 F. Supp. 2d 1224 (D. Colo. 2009). “]" 30 U.S.C. § 28i then denotes the consequences for failure to pay the fee: Failure to pay the claim maintenance fee or the location fee as required by sections 28f to 28k of this title shall conclusively constitute a forfeiture of the unpatented mining claim, mill or tunnel…”
Jordan v. Jordan, 8 P.3d 229 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). ““In 1992, Congress passed appropriations legislation for the Interior Department, which substituted a $100 per claim ‘maintenance fee’ for the $100 of assessment work requirement * * * . Failure to pay the fee ‘shall conclusively constitute a forfeiture of the unpatented mining…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.