32 U.S.C. § 108
Forfeiture of Federal benefits
If, within a time fixed by the President, a State fails to comply with a requirement of this title, or a regulation prescribed under this title, the National Guard of that State is barred, in whole or in part, as the President may prescribe, from receiving money or any other aid, benefit, or privilege authorized by law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2022 · leading case: Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United States, 603 F.3d 989 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United States, 603 F.3d 989 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “In 1994, when Congress amended the provision of Title 32 that authorizes withholding of federal benefits from a state National Guard in violation of a federal requirement, 32 U.S.C. § 108 (2009), it did not specify other remedies, although at the time appellate courts had upheld…”
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United States, 601 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2009). “3d at 1315-16 ; see also 32 U.S.C. § 108 . *153 2. National Guard Technicians “The National Guard Technician Act of 1968 is a special act of Congress enacted for the limited purpose of making fringe and retirement benefits of federal employees and coverage under the Federal Tort…”
Reid Knutson v. Wisconsin Air Nat'l Guard & Gerald D. Slack, 995 F.2d 765 (7th Cir. 1993). “See 32 U.S.C. § 108 . More specifically, Adjutant General Slack was acting pursuant to regulations adopted by the Department of Defense.”
James M. MacFarlane v. Ella T. Grasso, 696 F.2d 217 (2d Cir. 1982). “32 U.S.C. § 108 (1976) provides: If, within a time to be fixed by the President, a State does not comply with or enforce a requirement of, or regulation prescribed under, this title its National Guard is barred, wholly or partly as the President may prescribe, from receiving…”
Hazelton v. State Pers. Comm'n, 505 N.W.2d 793 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “Both the commission and the circuit court addressed 32 U.S.C. § 108 , that provides: If, within a time to be fixed by the President, a State does not comply with or enforce a requirement of, or regulation prescribed under, this title its National Guard is barred, wholly or…”
Kise v. Dep't of Military & Vets. Affairs, 784 A.2d 253 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001). “(June 19, 1996) (stating that Army National Guard personnel on full-time National Guard duty pursuant to Title 32 are subject to the applicable State U.”
Wigginton v. Centracchio, 787 A.2d 1151 (R.I. 2001). “4 Therefore, the term “staff corps and departments” cannot be construed to conflict with the organization of the ANGUS and the United States Army as set forth in the United States Code.”
Holmes v. California Army Nat'l Guard, 920 F. Supp. 1510 (N.D. Cal. 1996). “1990) (emphasis added); 32 U.S.C. § 108 (President may withhold federal funds if state fails to comply with any Title 32 provision); accord Charles, 28 F.”
Craig Morgan v. James Rhodes, 456 F.2d 608 (6th Cir. 1972). “*619 And under 32 U.S.C. § 108 , the President has available the following means by which to enforce any regulations which he or the Congress may prescribe for the National Guard: “If, within a time to be fixed by the President, a State does not comply with or enforce a…”
Krause v. Rhodes, 471 F.2d 430 (6th Cir. 1972). “And under 32 U.S.C. § 108 , the President has available the following means by which to enforce any regulations which he or the Congress may prescribe for the National Guard: ‘If, within a time to be fixed by the President, a State does not comply with or enforce a requirement…”
Farmer v. Mabus, 757 F. Supp. 1462 (S.D. Miss. 1991). “32 U.S.C. § 108 . Federal regulation of National Guard units requires each state to have an adjutant general who “shall perform the duties prescribed by the laws of that jurisdiction.”
Abbott v. Biden (E.D. Tex. 2022). “32 U.S.C. § 108 . And the National Guard is comprised of its prop- erty and members.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.