32 U.S.C. § 110
Regulations
The President shall prescribe regulations, and issue orders, necessary to organize, discipline, and govern the National Guard.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1972–2023 · leading case: Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United States, 601 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2009).
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United States, 601 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2009). “See 32 U.S.C. § 110 ; see also Charles, 28 F.”
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United States, 603 F.3d 989 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “[1] The Guardsmen contend such authority is plainly conferred by 32 U.S.C. § 110 , which authorizes the President to "govern" and "issue orders" to a state National Guard.”
Gilligan v. Morgan, 413 U.S. 1 (1973). “[11] 32 U. S. C. § 110 . [12] 10 U. S. C. § 331 et seq.”
Nelson v. Geringer, 295 F.3d 1082 (10th Cir. 2002). “See 32 U.S.C. § 110 ; id. § 104(b) (ANR units shall be organized according to regular Air Force regulation and as the Secretary of Defense provides).”
Charles v. Rice, Sec'y USAF, 28 F.3d 1312 (1st Cir. 1994). “32 U.S.C. § 110 . States that fail to comply with federal regulations risk forfeiture of federal funds allocated to organize, *1316 equip, and arm state Guards.”
Stirling v. Brown, 227 Cal. Rptr. 3d 645 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2018). “( 32 U.S.C. § 110 ; see Charles v. Rice (1st Cir.”
Nyberg v. State Military Dep't, 2003 WY 43 (Wyo. 2003). “Describing the relationship between the state and federal authority governing the National Guard, the First Circuit Court of Appeals stated the following: The Defense Department, the Secretaries of the Army and Air Force, and the National Guard Bureau prescribe regulations and…”
Abbott v. Biden, 70 F.4th 817 (5th Cir. 2023). “” 32 U.S.C. § 110 ; see also 10 U.S.C. § 10202 (a) (“Subject to standards, policies, and procedures prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of each military department shall prescribe such regulations as the Secretary considers necessary to carry out provisions of…”
Uhl v. Swanstrom, 876 F. Supp. 1545 (N.D. Iowa 1995). “32 U.S.C. § 110 . States that fail to comply-with federal regulations risk forfeiture of federal funds allocated to organize, equip, and arm state Guards.”
Craig Morgan v. James Rhodes, 456 F.2d 608 (6th Cir. 1972). “” 32 U.S.C. § 110 . *619 And under 32 U.S.C.”
Walker v. United States, 40 Fed. Cl. 666 (Fed. Cl. 1998). “32 U.S.C. § 110 . Federal funds are allocated to organize, equip, and arm the Guard.”
Krause v. Rhodes, 471 F.2d 430 (6th Cir. 1972). “’ 32 U. S.C. § 110. And under 32 U.S.C. § 108 , the President has available the following means by which to enforce any regulations which he or the Congress may prescribe for the National Guard: ‘If, within a time to be fixed by the President, a State does not comply with or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.