U.S. Code » Title 33 » Chapter CHAPTER 17— NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— NOAA FLEET MODERNIZATION

33 U.S.C. § 302

ACQUISITION OF FISHERY SURVEY VESSELS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 33 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)In General.—The Secretary, subject to the availability of appropriations, may acquire, by purchase, lease, lease-purchase, or charter, and equip fishery survey vessels in accordance with this section and the NOAA Fleet Modernization Act (33 U.S.C. 891 et seq.).“(b)Vessel Requirements.—Any vessel acquired and equipped under this section must—“(1) be capable of—“(A) staying at sea continuously for at least 30 days;“(B) conducting fishery population surveys using hydroacoustic, longlining, deep water, and pelagic trawls, and other necessary survey techniques; and“(C) conducting other work necessary to provide fishery managers with the accurate and timely data needed to prepare and implement fishery management plans; and“(2) have a hull that meets the International Council for Exploration of the Sea standard regarding acoustic quietness.“(c)Authorization.—To carry out this section there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1933–1976 · leading case: Houston Barge Line, Inc. v. Am. Com. Lines, 416 F. Supp. 417 (N.D. Miss. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Houston Barge Line, Inc. v. Am. Com. Lines, 416 F. Supp. 417 (N.D. Miss. 1976). “Several Rules deal directly with avoidance of collision between steam vessels (which by definition include the M/V WILBUR MILLS and the M/V BEN McCOOL, 33 U.S.C. § 302 ). Rule 18, 33 U.S.C. § 343 sets forth the normal procedure to be followed when ascending and descending…”
The Flying By, 4 F. Supp. 884 (D.N.J. 1933). “We find Congress sometimes enacting their own rules (33 USCA §§ 302, 311 et seq.); sometimes adopting international regulations by statute, Act of March 3, 1885, 23 Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.