33 U.S.C. § 405
Establishment and modification of harbor lines on Potomac and Anacostia Rivers
The provisions of section 404 of this title are made applicable to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, and after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1952–2016 · leading case: United States v. Old Dominion Boat Club, 630 F.3d 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2011).
United States v. Old Dominion Boat Club, 630 F.3d 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2011). “To begin with, only the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia— a trial level courL — actually reached the question of the scope of riparian rights under Maryland law of 1801.”
Martin v. Stand. Oil Co. Of New Jersey Stand. Oil Co. Of New Jersey v. Martin, 198 F.2d 523 (D.C. Cir. 1952). “206 , 33 U.S.C.A. § 405 . Martin’s wharf runs into the river beyond the bulkhead line.”
United States v. Robertson Terminal Warehouse, Inc., 575 F. Supp. 2d 210 (D.D.C. 2008). “Furthermore, 33 U.S.C. § 405 provides that "after July 25, 1912, harbor lines in the District of Columbia” are to be established or modified pursuant to 33 U.”
Joseph Abston v. Crowley Amer Trans Line, Inc., et (5th Cir. 2016). “PER CURIAM: ∗ Joseph Abston, a longshoreman working aboard Defendants’ ship, was injured when he slipped and fell from a “flat rack” cargo shipping container and brings this federal admiralty law action under 33 U.S.C. § 405 (b) alleging breaches of the duties of active control…”
Abston v. Jungerhaus Mar. Servs. GMBH & Co. KG, 664 F. App'x 378 (5th Cir. 2016). “PER CURIAM: * Joseph Abston, a longshoreman working aboard Defendants’ ship, was injured when he slipped and fell from a “flat rack” cargo shipping container and brings this federal admiralty law action under 33 U.S.C. § 405 (b) alleging breaches of the duties of active control…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.