36 U.S.C. § 2
That the plans of the proposed building shall first be approved by the American National Red Cross, the Commission of Fine Arts and the National Capital Park and Planning Commission and the erection and design thereof shall be under the supervision of the Administrator of the Federal Works Agency [now the Administrator of General Services] in accordance with the provisions of the Public Buildings Act of May 25, 1926 , as amended [enacting sections 341, 342, 343 to 345a, 346, and 347 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works] and as hereby further amended.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 63
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1951–2024 · leading case: Am. Nat'l Red Cross v. S. G., 505 U.S. 247 (1992).
Am. Nat'l Red Cross v. S. G., 505 U.S. 247 (1992). “600 , as amended, 36 U. S. C. § 2 . In this case we consider whether that "sue and be sued" provision confers original jurisdiction on federal courts over all cases to which the Red Cross is a party, with the consequence that the organization is thereby authorized to remove from…”
CH v. Am. Red Cross, 684 F. Supp. 1018 (E.D. Mo. 1988). “In her petition, plaintiff asserts several state law causes of action seeking damages for complications allegedly arising from cryoprecipitate transfusions given to plaintiff's minor child between June 24, 1984 and April 23, 1985. On August 22, 1986, defendants filed jointly a…”
Luckett v. Harris Hosp.-Fort Worth, 764 F. Supp. 436 (N.D. Tex. 1991). “1 Thereafter, on February 19, 1991, the Red Cross filed a notice of *438 removal alleging that federal subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to 36 U.S.C. § 2 and, therefore, the Red Cross is entitled to remove this action under 28 U.”
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Med. Benefits Trust v. Raines, 534 F.3d 779 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “2d 201 (1992) (quoting 36 U.S.C. § 2 (now codified as amended at 36 U.”
Richard Roe v. John O'DOnOhue, 38 F.3d 298 (7th Cir. 1994). “The Red Cross removed the case to federal court, representing that the other defendants “do not object to the removal of this action to federal court.”
Fed. Home Loan Bank of Bost v. Moody's Corp., 821 F.3d 102 (1st Cir. 2016). “2465 (quoting 36 U.S.C. § 2 (1988)). Relying on this language, the Red Cross removed to federal court a tort .”
S.G. & A.E. v. Am. Nat'l Red Cross, 938 F.2d 1494 (1st Cir. 1991). “This appeal presents the question of whether the language of the congressional charter of the American National Red Cross, 36 U.S.C. § 2 , confers original federal jurisdiction over all suits involving the Red Cross.”
Walton v. Howard Univ. T/A, 683 F. Supp. 826 (D.D.C. 1987). “Defendants base their petition on 36 U.S.C. § 2 (1982) and 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (a), or alternatively, upon 28 U.”
John Doe, Father of John Doe & Mother of John Doe v. Robert I. Kerwood, D.O., 969 F.2d 165 (5th Cir. 1992). “The plaintiffs contend that “the power to sue and be sued” clause, 36 U.S.C. § 2 , in the federal charter of the American Red Cross does not confer original jurisdiction in federal court over all lawsuits in which the Red Cross is a party.”
Patty C. Kaiser & James Kaiser v. Mem'l Blood Ctr. of Minneapolis, Inc. & Am. Red Cross, a Minnesota Corp., 938 F.2d 90 (8th Cir. 1991). “Plaintiffs alleged Memorial and the Red Cross should have accepted only donors at low risk for AIDS, screened blood collected for HIV, and warned other members of the medical profession and the general public about the risk of AIDS transmission through blood and blood products.”
Anonymous Blood Recipient v. William Beaumont Hosp., 721 F. Supp. 139 (E.D. Mich. 1989). “Defendant American Red Cross (“Red Cross”) removed the suit from Oakland County Circuit Court, claiming that 36 U.S.C. § 2 (“Section 2” or “the charter”) confers original jurisdiction over this case in the federal courts.”
Roe v. Little Co. of Mary Hosp., 800 F. Supp. 620 (N.D. Ill. 1992). “, supra, the Supreme Court determined that federal court jurisdiction over claims made against the Red Cross were based on the “separate and independent jurisdictional grant” of jurisdiction found in the Red Cross’ “sue or be sued” clause under 36 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.