Notes of Decisions
Procopio v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 943 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2019).
· cites it 3× “Section 2(a) of the Act amends Chapter 11 of title 38, “by inserting after section 1116” the section to be codified as 38 U.S.C. § 1116A. Id. § 2(a). Sec- tion 1116A clarifies the “[p]resumptions of service connec- tion for veterans who served offshore of the Republic of Vietnam.”
Robert E. Crews v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2023).
· cites it 29× “966 (codified in relevant part at 38 U.S.C. § 1116A), precludes a veteran from receiving a retroactive effective date1 for an award of benefits under that Act for an herbicide-related condition 1 Pursuant to 38 U.”
Crawford v. Collins (Fed. Cir. 2025).
· cites it 5× “The Board acknowledged 38 U.S.C. § 1116A pro- vides the standard for presumption of service connection for veterans who served offshore of Vietnam.”
190130-3219 (Board of Vet. App. 2020).
· cites it 4× “The Veteran had service in the offshore waters, DaNang Harbor, of the Republic of Vietnam; his exposure to herbicide agents is presumed under 38 U.S.C. § 1116A; and his diabetes mellitus is presumptively associated his with herbicide exposure in service.”
Military-Vets. Advocacy v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs (Fed. Cir. 2023).
· cites it 4× “See 38 U.S.C. § 1116A. However, the airspace over Vietnam was not included in the scope of the Act, as Congressman Mark Takano sub- mitted that “an aircraft that passed in the airspace above the offshore waters would not have drawn water from the sea and therefore is not…”
Military-Vets. Advocacy v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 63 F.4th 935 (Fed. Cir. 2023).
· cites it 4× “See 38 U.S.C. § 1116A. However, the airspace over Vietnam was not included in the scope of the Act, as Congressman Mark Takano sub- mitted that “an aircraft that passed in the airspace above the offshore waters would not have drawn water from the sea and therefore is not…”
210331-187529 (Board of Vet. App. 2021).
· cites it 2× “38 U.S.C. §§ 1116A, 1811, 1812, 1815, 1821, 1822; 38 C.”
190424-53339 (Board of Vet. App. 2020).
““Presumptive exposure to herbicide is conceded for veterans who served offshore of the Republic of Vietnam between January 6, 1962, and May 7, 1975, if the veteran served in an offshore location not more than 12 nautical miles seaward of a line commencing on the southwestern…”
200331-75169 (Board of Vet. App. 2021).
“See 38 U.S.C. § 1116A (effective January 1, 2020).”
200518-85372 (Board of Vet. App. 2021).
“§ 1116 (b); 38 U.S.C. § 1116A (those who served in the 12-nautical-mile territorial sea of the "Republic of Vietnam" are entitled to the presumption of herbicide exposure).”
190529-20541 (Board of Vet. App. 2021).
“See 38 U.S.C. § 1116A(d). Procopio v. Wilkie, 913 F.”
190506-20470 (Board of Vet. App. 2021).
“38 U.S.C. § 1116A. Service incurrence for certain diseases, including prostate cancer, will be presumed on the basis of an association with certain herbicide agents (e.”
— 38 U.S.C. § 1116A(a) — 3 cases
Procopio v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 943 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2019).
“Section 2(a) of the Act amends Chapter 11 of title 38, “by inserting after section 1116” the section to be codified as 38 U.S.C. § 1116A. Id. § 2(a). Sec- tion 1116A clarifies the “[p]resumptions of service connec- tion for veterans who served offshore of the Republic of Vietnam.”
Robert E. Crews v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2023).
“966 (codified in relevant part at 38 U.S.C. § 1116A), precludes a veteran from receiving a retroactive effective date1 for an award of benefits under that Act for an herbicide-related condition 1 Pursuant to 38 U.”
— 38 U.S.C. § 1116A(b) — 3 cases
Military-Vets. Advocacy v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs (Fed. Cir. 2023).
“See 38 U.S.C. § 1116A. However, the airspace over Vietnam was not included in the scope of the Act, as Congressman Mark Takano sub- mitted that “an aircraft that passed in the airspace above the offshore waters would not have drawn water from the sea and therefore is not…”
Military-Vets. Advocacy v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 63 F.4th 935 (Fed. Cir. 2023).
“See 38 U.S.C. § 1116A. However, the airspace over Vietnam was not included in the scope of the Act, as Congressman Mark Takano sub- mitted that “an aircraft that passed in the airspace above the offshore waters would not have drawn water from the sea and therefore is not…”
— 38 U.S.C. § 1116A(c)(1) — 1 case
Robert E. Crews v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2023).
“966 (codified in relevant part at 38 U.S.C. § 1116A), precludes a veteran from receiving a retroactive effective date1 for an award of benefits under that Act for an herbicide-related condition 1 Pursuant to 38 U.”
— 38 U.S.C. § 1116A(c)(2)(B) — 1 case
Robert E. Crews v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2023).
“966 (codified in relevant part at 38 U.S.C. § 1116A), precludes a veteran from receiving a retroactive effective date1 for an award of benefits under that Act for an herbicide-related condition 1 Pursuant to 38 U.”
— 38 U.S.C. § 1116A(c)(2)(B)(i) — 1 case
Robert E. Crews v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2023).
“966 (codified in relevant part at 38 U.S.C. § 1116A), precludes a veteran from receiving a retroactive effective date1 for an award of benefits under that Act for an herbicide-related condition 1 Pursuant to 38 U.”
— 38 U.S.C. § 1116A(c)(2)(B)(ii) — 1 case
Robert E. Crews v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2023).
“966 (codified in relevant part at 38 U.S.C. § 1116A), precludes a veteran from receiving a retroactive effective date1 for an award of benefits under that Act for an herbicide-related condition 1 Pursuant to 38 U.”
— 38 U.S.C. § 1116A(d) — 5 cases
Crawford v. Collins (Fed. Cir. 2025).
“The Board acknowledged 38 U.S.C. § 1116A pro- vides the standard for presumption of service connection for veterans who served offshore of Vietnam.”
190424-53339 (Board of Vet. App. 2020).
““Presumptive exposure to herbicide is conceded for veterans who served offshore of the Republic of Vietnam between January 6, 1962, and May 7, 1975, if the veteran served in an offshore location not more than 12 nautical miles seaward of a line commencing on the southwestern…”
190529-20541 (Board of Vet. App. 2021).
“See 38 U.S.C. § 1116A(d). Procopio v. Wilkie, 913 F.”
Military-Vets. Advocacy v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs (Fed. Cir. 2023).
“See 38 U.S.C. § 1116A. However, the airspace over Vietnam was not included in the scope of the Act, as Congressman Mark Takano sub- mitted that “an aircraft that passed in the airspace above the offshore waters would not have drawn water from the sea and therefore is not…”
Military-Vets. Advocacy v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 63 F.4th 935 (Fed. Cir. 2023).
“See 38 U.S.C. § 1116A. However, the airspace over Vietnam was not included in the scope of the Act, as Congressman Mark Takano sub- mitted that “an aircraft that passed in the airspace above the offshore waters would not have drawn water from the sea and therefore is not…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.