38 U.S.C. § 12

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 38 CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed. Pub. L. 102–83, § 3(3), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 402.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1951–1957 · leading case: Spencer v. United States, 102 F. Supp. 774 (Ct. Cl. 1952).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Spencer v. United States, 102 F. Supp. 774 (Ct. Cl. 1952). · cites it 4× “734 , 38 U.S.C.A. § 12 , that: "The duties, powers, and functions incident to the administration and payment of the benefits provided in section 456a of Title 10 are hereby vested in the Veterans' Administration: Provided, That in the administration of the retirement pay…”

Proper v. United States, 154 F. Supp. 317 (Ct. Cl. 1957). · cites it 2× “§ 456a, 38 U.S.C.A. § 12 ; and Executive Order 8099 (April 28, 1939), only the Secretary of the Army may determine eligibility for retirement benefits, including all questions of law and fact relating to such eligibility.”

Girault v. United States, 135 F. Supp. 521 (Ct. Cl. 1955). “§ 456A, 38 U.S.C.A. § 12 , providing for retired pay for reserve officers, gave the Secretary of War the power to determine the eligibility of such officers to the benefits of the Act, “including all questions of law and fact relating to such eligibility”.”

Spencer v. United States, 100 F. Supp. 444 (Ct. Cl. 1951). “734 , 38 U.S. C.A. § 12, that: “The duties, powers, and functions incident to the administration and payment of the benefits provided in section 456a of Title 10 -are vested in the Veterans’ Administration: Provided, That in the administration of the retirement pay provisions of…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.