U.S. Code
»
Title 38
» Part PART II— GENERAL BENEFITS › Chapter CHAPTER 17— HOSPITAL, NURSING HOME, DOMICILIARY, AND MEDICAL CARE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS RELATING TO HOSPITAL AND NURSING HOME CARE AND MEDICAL TREATMENT OF VETERANS
Notes of Decisions
Richard W. Staab v. Robert A. McDonald, 28 Vet. App. 50 (Vet. App. 2016).
· cites it 15× “The appellant argues that the Board erred in finding him ineligible for reimbursement under 38 U.S.C. § 1725 because (1) under the plain meaning of the statute, the partial coverage of his medical expenses by Medicare does not render him ineligible for reimbursement; (2) the…”
Van Dermark v. McDonough, 57 F.4th 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2023).
· cites it 4× “1553 (1999) (enacting 38 U.S.C. § 1725 ); Pub. L. No. 110-387, title IV, § 402(a), 122 Stat.”
Walter L. Fritz v. R. James Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 507 (Vet. App. 2006).
· cites it 11× “He was issued a Statement of the Case in August 2002 explaining that he was ineligible to have his medical bills paid under 38 U.S.C. § 1725 because he had not received medical care from VA in the 24 months preceding emergency treatment.”
Wolfe v. McDonough, 28 F.4th 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2022).
“” 38 U.S.C. § 1725 (c)(4)(D). The question is whether deductibles and coinsurance are encompassed within the term “similar payments.”
Linda L. Swinney v. Eric K. Shinseki, 23 Vet. App. 257 (Vet. App. 2009).
· cites it 8× “This matter was referred to a panel of the Court to consider the types of evidence that may be analyzed when determining whether a person may be reimbursed for emergency treatment furnished in a non-VA facility pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1725 1 *259 and 38 C.F.R. § 17.”
Denise Loreth v. Eric K. Shinseki, 23 Vet. App. 159 (Vet. App. 2009).
“Claim for Reimbursement With respect to the merits of her claim for reimbursement, the appellant argues that the Board erred in failing to discuss two relevant provisions of law: 38 U.S.C. § 1725 and 38 C.F.R. § 17.145 (2009).”
Amanda Jane Wolfe v. Robert L. Wilkie, No. 18-6091 (Vet. App. Sept. 9, 2019).
· cites it 11× “The petition raises two claims related to Congress's command through 38 U.S.C. § 1725 that in certain circumstances the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), reimburse veterans for the costs of their emergency medical care at non-VA facilities.”
13-18 540, No. 13-18 540 (Board of Vet. App. May 31, 2017).
· cites it 10× “There is competent, credible evidence that on January 3, 2012, representatives of Cassia Regional Medical Center were unsuccessful in their multiple attempts to contact the VA Medical Center in Boise, Idaho in order to transfer the Veteran. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for…”
190819-27009, No. 190819-27009 (Board of Vet. App. May 28, 2021).
· cites it 10× “38 U.S.C. § 1725 ; 38 C.F.R. §§ 17.1000-1008 .”
10-22 714, No. 10-22 714 (Board of Vet. App. Oct. 30, 2015).
· cites it 15× “38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1725 , 1728 (West 2014); 38 C.”
13-34 216, No. 13-34 216 (Board of Vet. App. Jan. 29, 2016).
· cites it 8× “38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1725 , 1728, 5107 (West 2014); 38 C.”
38 U.S.C. § 1725(a): 1 case
13-34 216, No. 13-34 216 (Board of Vet. App. Jan. 29, 2016).
“38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1725 , 1728, 5107 (West 2014); 38 C.”
38 U.S.C. § 1725(b): 1 case
13-34 216, No. 13-34 216 (Board of Vet. App. Jan. 29, 2016).
“38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1725 , 1728, 5107 (West 2014); 38 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.