42 U.S.C. § 1305
Short title of chapter
This chapter may be cited as the “Social Security Act”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2024 · leading case: Fairfield Cnty. Med. Ass'n v. United Healthcare, 985 F. Supp. 2d 262 (D. Conn. 2013).
Fairfield Cnty. Med. Ass'n v. United Healthcare, 985 F. Supp. 2d 262 (D. Conn. 2013). “Shortly after issuance of the October 31, 2013 notices, the Associations filed this lawsuit, alleging United had denied the terminated physicians’ substantive and procedural due process rights under the Medicare Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1305 et seq., and United had breached the…”
In Re the Adoption of A.M.B., 812 A.2d 659 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002). “In essence, these cases hold that the federal and state laws to expedite adoptions and to provide adoption assistance must look to the safety and welfare of the child in physical care and to promote expeditious adoptions by minimizing the time a child will be in temporary care…”
Amunrud v. Bd. of Appeals, 158 Wash. 2d 208 (Wash. 2006). “FACTS ¶3 In 1996, the United States Congress enacted Title III of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), 42 U.S.C. § 1305 , which imposed greater federal oversight over the states’ participation in the Child Support Enforcement Act,…”
Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 928 F.3d 1070 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Money Follows the Person (MFP) program is a federally-funded, time-limited grant program established under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, 42 U.S.C. § 1305 note, to help individuals transitioning from nursing facilities to the community.”
In Re Nicole B., 976 A.2d 1039 (Md. 2009). “2115 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 1305 and scattered sections of the Social Security Act), in contrast, was designed to promote and hasten the adoption of children in foster care and to facilitate the removal of children from abusive families.”
In Re Karl H., 906 A.2d 898 (Md. 2006). “2115 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 1305 note, noting that reasonable efforts shall be made to preserve and reunify children with their families while concurrently advancing reasonable efforts toward placing a child for adoption).”
Amunrud v. Bd. of Appeals, 143 P.3d 571 (Wash. 2006). “We affirm the Court of Appeals, finding that Amunrud received due process consistent with the federal and state constitutions. FACTS ¶ 3 In 1996, the United States Congress enacted Title III of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA),…”
Houston Methodist Hosp. v. Humana Ins. Co., 266 F. Supp. 3d 939 (S.D. Tex. 2017). “The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1305 , etseq. . Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (''ERISA"), 29 U.”
State ex rel. G.J.L., 791 So. 2d 80 (La. 2001). “; 42 U.S.C. § 1305 , et seq.); La. Child. Code art.”
Benn v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4869 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court found as a matter of law the federal Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. § 1305 et seq.) did not create, rights enforceable in a 42 United States Code section 1983 action.”
Donald Dvorak v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. Rockwell Int'l, 965 F.2d 606 (8th Cir. 1992). “See 42 U.S.C. § 1305 (1988) (Historical Note, Short Title of 1965 Amendment).”
State Ex Rel. Gjl, 791 So. 2d 80 (La. 2001). “; 42 U.S.C. § 1305 , et seq. ); La. Child. Code art.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.