38 U.S.C. § 316
Colocation of regional offices and medical centers
Prior section 316 was renumbered section 1116 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2002–2024 · leading case: Nehmer v. United States Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 494 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 2007).
Nehmer v. United States Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 494 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 2007). “The Agent Orange Act was originally codified at 38 U.S.C. § 316 , but six months later Congress renumbered § 316 of title 38 as § 1116.”
Larry A. Pelegrini v. Anthony J. Principi, 18 Vet. App. 112 (Vet. App. 2004). “11 , 11 (codified at 38 U.S.C. § 316 , renumbered at 38 U.S.C.”
Haas v. Peake, 525 F.3d 1168 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “§ 354 , which the Dioxin Act amended, at 38 U.S.C. § 316 (a)(3), which provided: For the purposes of this subsection, a veteran who, during active military, naval, or air service, served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam era and has a disease referred to in paragraph…”
Jonathan L. Haas v. R. James Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 257 (Vet. App. 2006). “1961, the precursor of Public Law 98-542, the Veterans’ Dioxin and Radiation Compensation Standards Act). In March 1983, H.”
Shirley D. Williams, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 310 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2002). “11 (1991) (codified in part at 38 U.S.C. § 316 (2000)) (“Agent Orange Act”).”
Taylor v. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 158 (Vet. App. 2014). “The Act established 38 U.S.C. § 316 (now section 1116), providing that veterans with qualifying service in Vietnam are entitled to a presumption of exposure to herbicides and a presumption of service connection for specified diseases, including diseases subsequently identified…”
Nehmer v. US Dep't of Vets. (9th Cir. 2007). “The Agent Orange Act was originally codified at 38 U.S.C. § 316 , but six months later Congress renumbered § 316 of title 38 as § 1116.”
Douglas A. Constantine v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2022). “6, 1991) ("Agent Orange Act"), then-codified at 38 U.S.C. § 316 , which established presumptive service connection for a list of diseases resulting from herbicide exposure.”
Victor Manuel Aviles-Rivera v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2022). “6, 1991) (originally codified at 38 U.S.C. § 316 but later renumbered as 38 U.”
Robert E. Crews v. Denis McDonough (Vet. App. 2023). “5 This presumption of service connection was initially codified at 38 U.S.C. § 316 and was later renumbered section 1116.”
Constantine v. McDonough (Fed. Cir. 2024). “Then-codified 38 U.S.C. § 316 required VA to “prescribe regulations providing that a presumption of service connec- tion is warranted” for a disease whenever the VA Secretary determines that a “positive association exists between” that disease and herbicide exposure.”
Larry A. Pelegrini v. Anthony J. Principi (Vet. App. 2004). “11 , 11 (codified at 38 U.S.C. § 316 , renumbered at 38 U.S.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.