38 U.S.C. § 705
Telephone service for medical officers and facility directors
The Secretary may pay for official telephone service and rental in the field whenever incurred in case of official telephones for directors of centers, hospitals, independent clinics, domiciliaries, and medical officers of the Department where such telephones are installed in private residences or private apartments or quarters, when authorized under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40
cases, 1933–1975 · leading case: Saul L. Wellman v. Summer G. Whittier, Individually & as Adm'r of Vets.' Affairs, United States Vets. Admin., 259 F.2d 163 (D.C. Cir. 1958).
Saul L. Wellman v. Summer G. Whittier, Individually & as Adm'r of Vets.' Affairs, United States Vets. Admin., 259 F.2d 163 (D.C. Cir. 1958). “21 The Administrator next argues that if 38 U.S.C.A. § 705 does not here apply, he may stand upon 38 U.”
Smith v. United States, 83 F.2d 631 (8th Cir. 1936). “All decisions rendered by the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs under the provisions of sections *639 701 to 721 of this title, or the regulations issued pursuant thereto, shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact, and no other official or court of the…”
United States v. Owens, 147 F. Supp. 309 (E.D. Ark. 1957). “In support of its action the Government advances two theories: First, that during the period in question the defendant, in fact, knowingly received benefits to which he was not entitled; and, second, that by virtue of the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 705 , the administrative…”
United States v. Lawrence, 154 F. Supp. 454 (D. Mont. 1957). “” In support of a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff contends that this court has no jurisdiction to review or determine the merits of the Veterans Administration decision finding the defendant ineligible to receive subsistence allowance during the calendar year 1950,…”
Hospoder v. United States, 209 F.2d 427 (3rd Cir. 1953). “It seems equally clear that by the terms of 38 U.S.C.A. § 705 , supra, mandamus is not available to challenge decisions of the Administrator rendered under the sections of the code there enumerated.”
United States Ex Rel. Trinler v. Carusi, 166 F.2d 457 (3rd Cir. 1948). “9 , Act March 20, 1933, 38 U.S.C.A. § 705 . In that Act such prohibition is expressly stated in clear and unequivocal language.”
Hahn v. Gray, Jr., Adm'r of Vets.' Affairs, 203 F.2d 625 (D.C. Cir. 1953). “9 (1933), 38 U.S.C.A. § 705 . 2 . “Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, * * * the decisions of the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs on any question of law or fact concerning a claim for benefits or payments under any Act administered by the Veterans’ Administration.”
Tracy v. Gleason, 379 F.2d 469 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “‘Claims for benefits under sections [enumerated as in 38 U.S.C. §§ 705 and 727] shall be filed with the Veterans’ Administration under such regulations, including provisions for hearing, determination, and administrative review, as the President may approve.”
DiSilvestro v. United States, 405 F.2d 150 (2d Cir. 1968). “Based on this forfeiture, the V. A. computed that there had been a total overpayment of compensation and subsistence benefits to appellee in the amount of $2,026.”
Frances Magnus, Adm'r of the Est. of Leo Michalowski, Deceased v. United States, 234 F.2d 673 (7th Cir. 1956). “9 , 38 U.S.C.A. § 705 , Congress expressly provided as follows: “All decisions rendered by the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs under the provisions * * * of this title or the regulations issued pursuant thereto, shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact,…”
United States v. Mroch, 88 F.2d 888 (6th Cir. 1937). “I of the Economy Act ( 38 U.S.C.A. § 705 ) seems to have removed the possibility of judicial relief even in such special circumstances.”
United States v. Daubendiek, 25 F.R.D. 50 (N.D. Ohio 1959). “) This provision became effective on January 1, 1959. Section 2, Public Law 85-857, Sept.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.