U.S. Code » Title 38 » Part PART I— GENERAL PROVISIONS › Chapter CHAPTER 7— EMPLOYEES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— GENERAL EMPLOYEE MATTERS

38 U.S.C. § 728

Misuse of Department purchase cards

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 38 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)In General.—(1) The Secretary shall prohibit any employee of the Department who the Secretary or the Inspector General of the Department determines has knowingly misused a purchase card from serving as a purchase card holder or approving official.(2) Such a prohibition shall be in addition to any other applicable penalty.(b)Misuse.—For purposes of this section, the term “misuse” means—(1) splitting purchases;(2) exceeding applicable purchase card limits or purchase thresholds;(3) purchasing any unauthorized item;(4) using a purchase card without being an authorized purchase card holder; or(5) violating ethics standards.(Added Pub. L. 115–407, title V, § 501(a), Dec. 31, 2018, 132 Stat. 5376.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1954–1996 · leading case: Saul L. Wellman v. Summer G. Whittier, 259 F.2d 163 (D.C. Cir. 1958).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Saul L. Wellman v. Summer G. Whittier, 259 F.2d 163 (D.C. Cir. 1958). · cites it 8× “The provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 728 actually were in aid of *167 the Soviet Union, as well as of our other allies, for a person might have been guilty of rendering assistance to an enemy of the Soviet Union, then our ally, and by his conduct have predicated a forfeiture under 38…”
Tulingan v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 484 (Vet. App. 1996). · cites it 3× “554 -55, which later became 38 U.S.C. § 728 . The purpose of the statute is clear: In short, no person, within the meaning of 38 U.”
Tracy v. Gleason, 379 F.2d 469 (D.C. Cir. 1967). ““We cannot doubt that ample and substantial grounds dictated the congressional intention that a veteran’s service-connected disability compensation was not to be forfeited by virtue of an unreviewable decision in the agency that a veteran was guilty of so serious an offense as…”
Simmons v. United States, 120 F. Supp. 641 (E.D. Pa. 1954). “286 (other than insurance); 38 U.S.C.A. § 728 , July 13, 1943, c. 233, § 4, 57 Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.