38 U.S.C. § 801

APPROPRIATION OF AMOUNTS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 38 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)In General.—There is authorized to be appropriated, and is appropriated, to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated $5,000,000,000 to carry out subsection (b). Such funds shall be available for obligation or expenditure without fiscal year limitation.“(b)Use of Amounts.—The amount appropriated under subsection (a) shall be used by the Secretary as follows:“(1) To increase the access of veterans to care as follows:“(A) To hire primary care and specialty care physicians for employment in the Department of Veterans Affairs.“(B) To hire other medical staff, including the following:“(i) Physicians.“(ii) Nurses.“(iii) Social workers.“(iv) Mental health professionals.“(v) Other health care professionals as the Secretary considers appropriate.“(C) To carry out sections 301 [enacting section 7412 of this title, amending sections 7302 and 7612 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 7302 and 7412 of this title] and 302 [amending sections 7619 and 7683 of this title], including the amendments made by such sections.“(D) To pay for expenses, equipment, and other costs associated with the hiring of primary care, specialty care physicians, and other medical staff under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C).“(2) To improve the physical infrastructure of the Department as follows:“(A) To maintain and operate hospitals, nursing homes, domiciliary facilities, and other facilities of the Veterans Health Administration.“(B) To enter into contracts or hire temporary employees to repair, alter, or improve facilities under the jurisdiction of the Department that are not otherwise provided for under this paragraph.“(C) To carry out leases for facilities of the Department.“(D) To carry out minor construction projects of the Department.“(c)Availability.—The amount appropriated under subsection (a) shall remain available until expended.“(d)Report.—“(1)In general.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 7, 2014], the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on how the Secretary has obligated the amounts appropriated under subsection (a) as of the date of the submittal of the report.“(2)Appropriate committees of congress defined.—In this subsection, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means—“(A) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and“(B) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.“(e)Funding Plan.—The Secretary shall submit to Congress a funding plan describing how the Secretary intends to use the amounts provided under subsection (a).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 126 cases, 1944–2013 · leading case: Wissner v. Wissner, 338 U.S. 655 (1950).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wissner v. Wissner, 338 U.S. 655 (1950). · cites it 2× “1008 , as amended, 38 U. S. C. § 801 et seq. Amendments added in 1946, 60 Stat.”

United States v. Henning, 344 U.S. 66 (1952). · cites it 4× “Disposition of the cause depends on our interpretation of the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940, as amended, 38 U. S. C. § 801 et seq., which in pertinent part [1] provides: § 602 (g).”

Cose v. Cose, 592 P.2d 1230 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 2× “The Supreme Court held that under the supremacy clause, the state order was invalid because the specific language of the Act, when read in light of congressional intent, gave the insured serviceman the absolute right to select the beneficiary of his choice. Therefore, state…”

Phillipson v. Bd. of Admin., Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys., 473 P.2d 765 (Cal. 1970). · cites it 2× “) In that case a California wife claimed a community property interest in the proceeds of a soldier's life insurance policy issued under the National Service Life Insurance Act ( 38 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.). In a 5-3 decision, the Supreme Court rejected her claim, holding that the…”

Bradley v. United States, 143 F.2d 573 (10th Cir. 1944). · cites it 2× “Bradley, and his widow, Annie Mae Bradley, filed separate claims with the Veterans' Administration, each claiming to be the sole beneficiary under a $10,000 life insurance policy issued to him under the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940, 38 U.S.C.A. § 801 et seq. When…”

Leyerly v. United States, 162 F.2d 79 (10th Cir. 1947). · cites it 2× “On December 20, 1941, the Congress amended the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940, 38 U.S.C.A. § 801 et seq., 54 Stat. 1008 , to provide in material part that if any person in active military or naval service, on or after October 8, 1940, dies ill line of duty within…”

Thomas v. United States, 189 F.2d 494 (6th Cir. 1951). · cites it 2× “The district court held that the beneficiary, who was the aunt of Hinds, did not stand in loco parentis to him and, therefore, was not entitled to recover under the provisions of the National Service Life Insurance Act, 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 801 et seq., as amended. The applicable…”

Nat'l Org. of Vets. Advocates, Inc. v. Sec'y of Vets. Affairs, 710 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “See 38 U.S.C. § 801 (2006); see also Henderson v.”

Mitchell v. United States, 165 F.2d 758 (5th Cir. 1948). “Report Form was such a positive affirmative act by the deceased within the meaning of the statute as definitely to express his intent to effect a change in beneficiary; and (3) that the court erred in holding the evidence sufficient to establish an affirmative act on the…”

United States v. Zazove, 334 U.S. 602 (1948). “974 , 1008, 38 U. S. C. §§801 , 802 (h) (2). 3 Pursuant to § 617 of the Act, 38 U.”

Baumet v. United States, 344 U.S. 82 (1953). · cites it 2× “…opinion are reprinted at pp. 10 to 24 of the Appendix to the Brief for the United States. [4] §§ 601 (f), 602 (g); 38 U. S. C. §§ 801 (f), 802 (g). [5] § 602 (h) (3) (C); 38 U. S. C. § 802 (h) (3) (C). [6] Baumet v. United States, 191 F. 2d 194 (2d Cir. 1951). [7] Id., at…”

Mahaley v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth., 355 F. Supp. 1245 (N.D. Ohio 1973). · cites it 2× “§ 1701q (loans for housing for elderly and handicapped); 38 U.S.C. §§ 801 , 1810, 1811 (housing subsidies for veterans).”

Show all 126 citing cases →

— 38 U.S.C. § 801(f) — 1 case

United States v. Hoth, 207 F.2d 386 (9th Cir. 1953).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.