U.S. Code » Title 4 » Chapter CHAPTER 4— THE STATES

4 U.S.C. § 108

Same; jurisdiction of United States over Federal areas unaffected

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 4 CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of sections 105–110 of this title shall not for the purposes of any other provision of law be deemed to deprive the United States of exclusive jurisdiction over any Federal area over which it would otherwise have exclusive jurisdiction or to limit the jurisdiction of the United States over any Federal area.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1957–1986 · leading case: United Pac. Ins. Co. v. Wyoming Excise Tax Div., Dep't of Revenue & Taxation, 713 P.2d 217 (Wyo. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United Pac. Ins. Co. v. Wyoming Excise Tax Div., Dep't of Revenue & Taxation, 713 P.2d 217 (Wyo. 1986). · cites it 2× “" 4 U.S.C. § 108 provides: "The provisions of sections 105-110 of this title shall not for the purposes of any other provision of law be deemed to deprive the United States of exclusive jurisdiction over any Federal area over which it would otherwise have exclusive jurisdiction…”
City of Philadelphia v. Bullion, 368 A.2d 1375 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1977). “” 9 4 U.S.C. §108 provides: The provisions of sections 105 to 11Ó of this title shall not for the purposes of any other provision of law be deemed to deprive the United States of exclusive jurisdiction over any Federal area over which it would otherwise have exclusive…”
City of Philadelphia v. Konopacki, 366 A.2d 608 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1976). “4 4 U.S.C. §108 reads: “The provisions of sections 105 to 110 of this title shall not for the purposes of any other provision of law be deemed to deprive the United States of exclusive jurisdiction over any Federal area over which it would otherwise have exclusive jurisdiction…”
Murphy v. Love, 249 F.2d 783 (10th Cir. 1957). “4 U.S.C.A. § 108 specifically provides that Sections 105 to 110 shall not otherwise [than for the collection of taxes] deprive the *788 United States of its exclusive jurisdiction over the Reservation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.