40 U.S.C. § 13

REVIEW BY OMB.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 40 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)Review of Recommendations.—Upon receipt of the Board’s recommendations pursuant to subsections (b) and (h) of section 12, the Director of OMB shall conduct a review of the recommendations.“(b)Report to Board and Congress.—Not later than 30 days after the receipt of the Board’s recommendations, the Director of OMB shall transmit to the Board and Congress a report that sets forth the Director of OMB’s approval or disapproval of the Board’s recommendations.“(c)Approval and Disapproval.—“(1)Approval.—If the Director of OMB approves the Board’s recommendations, the Director of OMB shall transmit a copy of the recommendations to Congress, together with a certification of such approval.“(2)Disapproval.—If the Director of OMB disapproves the Board’s recommendations, in whole or in part, the Director of OMB shall transmit a copy of the recommendations to Congress and the reasons for disapproval of the recommendations to the Board and Congress.“(3)Revised recommendations.—Not later than 30 days after the receipt of reasons for disapproval under paragraph (2), the Board shall transmit to the Director of OMB revised recommendations for approval.“(4)Approval of revised recommendations.—If the Director of OMB approves the revised recommendations, in whole or in part, received under paragraph (3), the Director of OMB shall transmit a copy of the recommendations to Congress, together with a certification of such approval.“(d)Termination of Process for Given Round.—If the Director of OMB does not transmit to Congress an approval and certification described in paragraph (1) or (4) of subsection (c) on or before the 30th day following the receipt of the Board’s recommendations or revised recommendations, as the case may be, the process shall terminate until the following round, as described in section 12.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1980–2013 · leading case: United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983). · cites it 2× “Of course, this is not to say that those sidewalks, like other sidewalks, are not subject to reasonable *184 time, place, and manner restrictions, either by statute or by regulations issued pursuant to 40 U. S. C. § 13 l. The judgment below is accordingly affirmed to the extent…”

Mary Terese Grace, Thaddeus Zywicki v. Warren E. Burger, Chief Just. of the United States Supreme Court, 665 F.2d 1193 (D.C. Cir. 1981). · cites it 3× “Another section of the statute, 40 U.S.C. § 13 / (1976), provides that, “[i]n addition to the restrictions and requirements specified in sections [13g-13k], the Marshal of the Supreme Court may prescribe such regulations .”

Grace v. Burger, 524 F. Supp. 815 (D.D.C. 1980). · cites it 2× “On the other hand, 40 U.S.C. § 13 / authorizes the Supreme Court Marshal to issue and publish regulations for the “maintenance of suitable order and decorum within the Supreme Court building and grounds.”

Hodge v. Talkin, 949 F. Supp. 2d 152 (D.D.C. 2013). “In doing so, the court noted correctly that "Section 13[1] was implicitly approved by the Supreme Court in Grace, where it noted that Supreme Court sidewalks are ‘subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions, either by statute or by regulations issued pursuant to…”

Pearson v. United States, 581 A.2d 347 (D.C. 1990). “The unlawful entry charge was based on 40 U.S.C. § 13 / and Regulation Two. See supra note 2.”

Simon v. United States, 570 A.2d 305 (D.C. 1990). “" 40 U.S.C. § 13 /(b) (1982). See also 40 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.