U.S. Code » Title 40 » Subtitle SUBTITLE VI— MISCELLANEOUS › Chapter CHAPTER 183— NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA INTEREST ARBITRATION STANDARDS

40 U.S.C. § 18302

Definitions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 40 CasesGoogle Scholar
In this chapter, the following definitions apply:(1)Arbitration.—The term “arbitration”—(A) means the arbitration of disputes, regarding the terms and conditions of employment, that is required under an interstate compact governing an interstate compact agency operating in the national capital area; but(B) does not include the interpretation and application of rights arising from an existing collective bargaining agreement.(2)Arbitrator.—The term “arbitrator” refers to either a single arbitrator, or a board of arbitrators, chosen under applicable procedures.(3)Interstate compact agency operating in the national capital area.—The term “interstate compact agency operating in the national capital area” means any interstate compact agency that provides public transit services and that was established by an interstate compact to which the District of Columbia is a signatory.(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1292.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

18302

40:1302(1), (2), (4), (5).

Pub. L. 104–50, title IV, § 403(1), (2), (4), (5), Nov. 15, 1995, 109 Stat. 464.

The text of 40:1302(4) and (5) is combined to eliminate unnecessary words.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2011–2013 · leading case: Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union, 818 F. Supp. 2d 888 (D. Maryland 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union, 818 F. Supp. 2d 888 (D. Maryland 2011). · cites it 4× “The Standards Act does not apply to all arbitrations initiated pursuant to the Compact, but only to those which, like the present arbitration, concern "the terms and conditions of employment .”
Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Local 2, Off. & Prof'l Employees Int'l Union, Afl-Cio, 965 F. Supp. 2d 13 (D.D.C. 2013). · cites it 2× “” 40 U.S.C. § 18302 (1) (2006). Two separate inquiries are bound up in this provision: first, whether the Act applies to the parties; and second, whether this arbitration is the type of proceeding at which the Standards Act is aimed.”
Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union, 804 F. Supp. 2d 457 (D. Maryland 2011). “” 40 U.S.C. § 18302 (1)(A). 9 . A reviewing court must also consider, pursuant to the Act, whether the award is in violation of some other law; whether the arbitrator otherwise exceeded his powers; whether there was partiality or misconduct by the arbitrator; and/or whether the…”
— 40 U.S.C. § 18302(1)(A) — 1 case
Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union, 818 F. Supp. 2d 888 (D. Maryland 2011). “The Standards Act does not apply to all arbitrations initiated pursuant to the Compact, but only to those which, like the present arbitration, concern "the terms and conditions of employment .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.