40 U.S.C. § 405

CONGRESSIONAL REPORTS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 40 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)District of Columbia.—Not later than January 31 of each year, the Mayor of the District of Columbia shall report to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Government Reform [now Committee on Oversight and Accountability], the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Resources, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives on the use and development during the previous year of land for which title is conveyed to the District of Columbia and land for which administrative jurisdiction is transferred to the District of Columbia pursuant to this Act.“(b)Comptroller General.—The Comptroller General shall report periodically to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Government Reform [now Committee on Oversight and Accountability], the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Resources, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives on—“(1) the use and development during the previous 2 years of land for which title is conveyed and land for which administrative jurisdiction is transferred pursuant to this Act; and“(2) if applicable, how such use and development complies with the Anacostia Waterfront Framework Plan referred to in section 103 of the Anacostia Waterfront Corporation Act of 2004 (sec. 2–1223.03, D.C. Official Code).“(c)Sunset.—This section shall expire 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 15, 2006].

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2020–2026 · leading case: Suey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (C.D. Ill. 2021).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Suey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (C.D. Ill. 2021). · cites it 2× “40 U.S.C. § 405 (g). His failure to take advantage of his right to judicial review did not deny him due process.”

Maria Guzman v. Nancy A. Berryhill (C.D. Cal. 2020). “40 U.S.C. § 405 (g). 17 Plaintiff fails to demonstrate good cause for failing to submit post-2016 18 documents before her appeal to the district court.”

Statkiewicz v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (D.N.J. 2022). “III. STANDARD OF REVIEW A. Substantial Evidence Review This Court reviews the final decision of the Commissioner only to assess whether the decision rests on application of proper legal standards and is supported by “substantial evidence.”

Brown v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (S.D. Ohio 2025). “) Thus, the ALJ “demonstrated a clear consideration of the evidence postdating the medical opinions,” indicating that the AL] “supported his decision with substantial evidence,” satisfying the standard of review under 40 U.S.C. § 405 (g). (Id.; see also Carr, 2024 WL 1343473 ,…”

Simmons (D. Or. 2026). “Abuse of discretion is not found 40 U.S.C. § 405 (g), and Plaintiff cites not authority for that standard in this case.”

— 40 U.S.C. § 405(g) — 1 case

Suey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (C.D. Ill. 2021). “40 U.S.C. § 405 (g). His failure to take advantage of his right to judicial review did not deny him due process.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.