42 U.S.C. § 10602
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2023 · leading case: Opert v. Crim. Injuries Comp. Bd., 943 A.2d 1229 (Md. 2008).
Opert v. Crim. Injuries Comp. Bd., 943 A.2d 1229 (Md. 2008). “In 1988, Congress amended 42 U.S.C. § 10602 (b) to require, among other things, that the State program offer compensation to victims of drunk driving and domestic violence and to residents of the State who are victims of crimes occurring outside the State if the crimes would be…”
United States v. Rene Spiropoulos, 976 F.2d 155 (3rd Cir. 1992). “See 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 10602 , 10603 (West, 1992 Supp.”
United States v. Edward Tholl, 895 F.2d 1178 (7th Cir. 1990). “42 U.S.C. §§ 10602 (a)(2), 10603(a)(1). 10 .”
United States v. Robertson, 638 F. Supp. 1202 (E.D. Va. 1986). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 10602 (1986 pamphlet); see also The Arlington Journal, June 10, 1986, Al, at A10 (indicating that Virginia has in 1986 received its first federal grant, in the amount of $186,000.”
Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Conaway, 98 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1996). “42U.S.C. § 10602(c). . This seems contrary to the usual policy of requiring that actions on oral contracts be brought sooner than those on written contracts.”
United States v. Simpson, 885 F.2d 36 (3rd Cir. 1989). “” 42 U.S.C. § 10602 (b). Crime victim assistance grantees must “demonstrate[ ] a record of providing effective services to victims of crime,” and can spend program funds only on “(a) crisis intervention services; (b) providing, in an emergency, transportation to court,…”
Sheppard v. Crime Victims Comp. Bd., 568 N.W.2d 405 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “The mandate important for our purposes is found in 42 U.S.C. § 10602 (b)(7): (b) A crime victim compensation program is an eligible crime victim compensation program for the purposes of this section if * * * * * * (7) such program does not, except pursuant to rules issued by…”
Johnson v. Rosenthal (S.D. Tex. 2023). “§ 2679 (b), which pertains to the exclusiveness of certain remedies against the United States; and (3) crime victim compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 10602 (b) (Dkt. 1-3, at 8-9).”
— 42 U.S.C. § 10602(c) — 1 case
Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Conaway, 98 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1996). “42U.S.C. § 10602(c). . This seems contrary to the usual policy of requiring that actions on oral contracts be brought sooner than those on written contracts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.