42 U.S.C. § 10608
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1997–2011 · leading case: Hollingsworth v. Perry
Hollingsworth v. Perry (2010)
“42 U. S. C. §10608 . The statute was drawn with care to provide precise and detailed guid ance with respect to the wide range of issues implicated by the broadcast.”
American Civil Liberties Union v. Holder (2011)
“§ 5318A(f) (allowing ex parte and in camera submission of evidentiary support for Secretary of Treasury’s designation of a "primary money laun- dering concern"); 42 U.S.C. § 10608 (c) (mandating sealing of any tapes created by closed-circuit broadcast of court proceedings for…”
United States v. McVeigh (1997)
“In conjunction with the Victims' Rights Act, the excluded witnesses also refer generally to 42 U.S.C. § 10608 , which provides for closed circuit televising of certain criminal proceedings.”
ACLU v. Holder (2011)
“§ 5318A(f) (allowing ex parte and in camera submission of evidentiary support for Secretary of Treasury’s designation of a "primary money laun- dering concern"); 42 U.S.C. § 10608 (c) (mandating sealing of any tapes created by closed-circuit broadcast of court proceedings for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.