42 U.S.C. § 11
BUDGET ACT.
“No authority under this Act to enter into contracts or to make payments shall be effective in any fiscal year except to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Lasnetski v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 128 Fed. Cl. 242 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
Lasnetski v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 128 Fed. Cl. 242 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “Petitioner also cites 42 U.S.C. § 11 (c)(1)(C)(i) (2012) in support of her argument.”
In Re Ben Jean Prevot & Arielle Dominique Prevot, the Minor Child.. Jean-Claude Prevot v. Debra Moseman Prevot, 59 F.3d 556 (6th Cir. 1995). “He has abused the laudable purposes of ICARA by employing it to further his scheme. His fugitivity, and his actions, constitute abuses to which a court should not accede.”
Gruber v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 61 Fed. Cl. 674 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “Other prerequisites to compensation include: (1) that the injured party suffered the residual effects of a vaccine-related injury for more than six months after the administration of the vaccine, 42 U.S.C. § 11 (c)(1)(D)(I); (2) that petitioner incurred in excess of $1,000 in…”
Murphy v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. (Fed. Cl. 2016). “268, 270 (1995) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 11 (c)(1)(C)(i)). Accordingly, to establish a Table encephalopathy in this case, Petitioners must demonstrate that M.”
Fuhri v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. (Fed. Cl. 2017). “42 U.S.C. § 11 (c)(1)(C)(i).” Id. at 4 .3 Lastly, petitioner alleged that the vaccines were the cause in fact of T.”
Struck v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. (Fed. Cl. 2018). “The filing contains a statement that "he has filed, to the best of his knowledge, all of the records required by 42 U.S.C. § 11 ( c)"pertaining to his case.”
L. v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. (Fed. Cl. 2018). “The Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11 (c)(1)(D)(i), requires petitioner to suffer the residual effects or complications of a vaccine reaction for more than six months.”
Yalacki v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. (Fed. Cl. 2019). “268, 270 (1995) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 11 (c)(1)(C)(i)); Moberly v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.”
Sharpe v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. (Fed. Cl. 2019). “268, 270 (1995) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 11 (c)(1)(C)(i)); Moberly v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.”
McKown v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. (Fed. Cl. 2019). “268, 270 (1995) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 11 (c)(1)(C)(i)); Moberly v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.”
Kaplan v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. (Fed. Cl. 2021). “at 4 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 11 (c)(1)(D)(i)). In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.”
Goodgame v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. (Fed. Cl. 2021). “Accordingly, at the time Petitioner filed her statement of completion, affirming that “she has filed, to the best of her knowledge, all of the records required by 42 U.S.C. §11 (c) pertaining to the above-captioned case,” ECF No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.