42 U.S.C. § 1106

Unemployment compensation research program

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The Secretary of Labor shall—(1) establish a continuing and comprehensive program of research to evaluate the unemployment compensation system. Such research shall include, but not be limited to, a program of factual studies covering the role of unemployment compensation under varying patterns of unemployment including those in seasonal industries, the relationship between the unemployment compensation and other social insurance programs, the effect of State eligibility and disqualification provisions, the personal characteristics, family situations, employment background and experience of claimants, with the results of such studies to be made public; and(2) establish a program of research to develop information (which shall be made public) as to the effect and impact of extending coverage to excluded groups with first attention to agricultural labor.(b) To assist in the establishment and provide for the continuation of the comprehensive research program relating to the unemployment compensation system, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971, and for each fiscal year thereafter, such sums, not to exceed $8,000,000, as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this section. From the sums authorized to be appropriated by this subsection the Secretary may provide for the conduct of such research through grants or contracts.(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title IX, § 906, as added Pub. L. 91–373, title I, § 141, Aug. 10, 1970, 84 Stat. 705.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 1106, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title IX, § 906, 49 Stat. 642, related to excusing payment of tax by engaging in interstate commerce. For further details, see Prior Law note set out preceding section 1101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1942–2010 · leading case: In Re Sorrell, 359 B.R. 167 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2007).
In Re Sorrell, 359 B.R. 167 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2007). “The UST recognizes that there is no “definitive guide” to the term “benefits” in the Social Security Act (Doc.”
Cent. States, Se. v. Mcnamara Motor Exp., 503 F. Supp. 96 (W.D. Mich. 1980). “00 should issue due to Section 406(a)(1) of ERI-SA, 42 U.S.C. § 1106 (a)(1), which reads in part: “(a) Except as provided in section 1108 of this title: (1) A fiduciary with respect to a plan shall not cause the plan to engage in a transaction, if he knows or should know that…”
Washington v. Reding, 438 B.R. 348 (M.D. Ala. 2010). “The Washingtons therefore argue that, when the Social Security Act is viewed as the federal statutory component of a “federal-state cooperative” program directed at “providing a ‘substitute’ for wages,” then unemployment benefits received through federally funded state programs…”
Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United States, 50 F. Supp. 329 (S.D.N.Y. 1942). “Code This contention seems to be refuted by Title 42 U.S.C.A. § 1106 ; Regulations 91, Article 504; Regulations 90, Article 503; 1 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.