42 U.S.C. § 12115

Posting notices

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

Every employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee covered under this subchapter shall post notices in an accessible format to applicants, employees, and members describing the applicable provisions of this chapter, in the manner prescribed by section 2000e–10 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1995–2014 · leading case: Chamber of Com. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 721 F.3d 152 (4th Cir. 2013).
Chamber of Com. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 721 F.3d 152 (4th Cir. 2013). · cites it 3× “§ 2003 ; Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12115 ; Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.”
Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc., 228 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2000). “See 42 U.S.C. § 12115 ("Every employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee covered under this subchapter shall post notices in an accessible format to applicants, employees, and members describing the applicable provisions of this chapter.”
Charles E. Donahue v. Consol. Rail Corp., 224 F.3d 226 (3rd Cir. 2000). “See 42 U.S.C. § 12115 , 12113(b). 5 . See 42 U.”
Chamber of Com. of the United States v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 856 F. Supp. 2d 778 (D.S.C. 2012). · cites it 2× “§ 2003 Americans with Disabilities Act 1990 42 U.S.C. § 12115 Family and Medical Leave Act 1993 29 U.”
Connolly v. Bidermann Indus. U.S.A., Inc., 56 F. Supp. 2d 360 (S.D.N.Y. 1999). · cites it 2× “” 42 U.S.C. § 12115 (5)(A). The EEOC has issued interpretive guidelines with respect to the issue of reassigning disabled employees to vacant positions.”
McDonald v. Com. of Mass., 901 F. Supp. 471 (D. Mass. 1995). “” (#20 ¶4) Next, GAIC is purported to be “an instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for purposes of providing Worker’s Compensation insurance pursuant to M.”
Baumgardner v. Cnty. of Cook, 108 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (N.D. Ill. 2000). “42 U.S.C. § 12115 . And the powers, remedies, and procedures provided by the ADA are those provided for by Title VII.”
Doe v. Marshall, 882 F. Supp. 1504 (E.D. Pa. 1995). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 12115 . In support of his motion, Defendant argues that the ADA does not apply to him because: 1) he is not a public entity; 2) the alleged harassment was of a private nature and the ADA was not designed to cure private behaviors of state actors; and 3) the…”
Bernard v. EDS Noland Episcopal Day Sch., 62 F. Supp. 3d 535 (W.D. La. 2014). “42 U.S.C. § 12115 . These notices are to be posted in “conspicuous places.”
Sánchez-Arroyo v. Dep't of Educ., 842 F. Supp. 2d 416 (D.P.R. 2012). “; and 42 U.S.C. §§ 12115 , et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.”
Reilly v. Upper Darby Twp., 809 F. Supp. 2d 368 (E.D. Pa. 2011). “See 42 U.S.C. § 12115 ; id. § 2000e-10(a). (The PHRA contains a similar requirement.”
Umble v. Arrowhead Cmty. Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 8 F. App'x 756 (9th Cir. 2001). “Because we find that no duty to accommodate arose, we do not reach Umble’s argument that the alleged absence of an ADA policy and failure to post notices in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 12115 results in the defendants’ waiver of the right to assert that they reasonably…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.