U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 7— SOCIAL SECURITY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XVI— SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED

42 U.S.C. § 1381a

Basic entitlement to benefits

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

Every aged, blind, or disabled individual who is determined under part A to be eligible on the basis of his income and resources shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this subchapter, be paid benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 387 cases (124 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: Schweiker v. Gray Panthers
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schweiker v. Gray Panthers (1981) scotus · cites it 2× “; 42 U. S. C. §§ 1381a, 1382 (a), 1382c (b), 1382c (f).”
Jean D. Byam v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration (2003) ca2 “See 42 U.S.C. § 1381a. The Act defines disability as an “inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a…”
Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human Services (1981) ca3 “§§ 416 (i), 423 (1976), and for Supplemental Security Income Benefits under Title XVI of the Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1381a (1976). Benefits were denied initially, and again on reconsideration.”
Liskowitz v. Astrue (2009) ca7 “42 U.S.C. §§ 1381a, 1382; Sienkiewicz, 409 F.”
Fischer v. Colvin (2016) ca1 “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381a, 423(a)(1)(A); Splude v.”
Keith Brunson v. Commissioner Social Security (2017) ca3 “42 U.S.C. § 1381a. To establish disability, the individual must show that “there is some ‘medically determinable basis for an impairment that prevents him from engaging in any’ substantial gainful activity ‘for a .”
Artrip v. Noe (2010) ky · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 1381a (1973). While Social Security benefits of the type at issue here are arguably a financial resource of a recipient, we do not believe that such benefits are the type of "independent financial resource" that would allow a trial court to deviate from the basic…”
Metropolitan Hospital v. United States Department of Health & Human Services (2013) ca6 · cites it 2× “, 42 U.S.C. § 1381a (titled “Basic entitlement to benefits,” but describing persons determined “to be eligible on the basis of [] income and resources”).”
Lynne A. Sienkiewicz v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security (2005) ca7 “42 U.S.C. §§ 1381a, 1382; see also Splude v.”
Roosevelt McKinney v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration (2000) ca8 “§§ 416 (i) & 423, and for supplemental security income pursuant to Title XVI, 42 U.S.C. § 1381a. We affirm. I. McKinney was born on December 19, 1940.”
Connie L. BAKER, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee (1992) ca8 “Baker appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to deny her application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381a. Baker argues that there is not substantial…”
Brenda L. v. Saul (2019) illinoised “Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE Introduction Plaintiff applied for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381a, 1382c, almost nine years ago, in July of 2009.”
Show all 387 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.