42 U.S.C. § 1391
Authorization of appropriations
For the purpose of assisting the States (including the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa) to plan for and take other steps leading to comprehensive State and community action to combat mental retardation, there is authorized to be appropriated the sum of $2,200,000. There are also authorized to be appropriated, for assisting such States in initiating the implementation and carrying out of planning and other steps to combat mental retardation, $2,750,000 for the fiscal year ending
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2023 · leading case: Caremark Therapeutic Services v. Leavitt
Caremark Therapeutic Services v. Leavitt (2006)
“CTS relies on 42 U.S.C. § 1391 (c) (“ § 1391(c)”), which defines residence for corporate defendants, for its assertion that it resides in the Southern District of New York.”
California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp. (1989)
“” Additionally, Congress included Title XVII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1391 et seq., in its list of nine representative programs that are not programs of financial assistance.”
Gordon v. Berryhill (2019)
“Saul’s1 18 denial of her application under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1391 et 19 seq. See Dkt. No.”
Calderon v. City and County of Denver (2023)
“The City and County of Denver (the “City”) created the CRP program in 2007 to provide “transitional services to adult Denver residents released from the Denver County Jail and Downtown 1 The facts below are taken from plaintiff’s amended complaint, Docket No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.