U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 151— CHILD PROTECTION AND SAFETY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION › Part Part A— Sex Offender Registration and Notification

42 U.S.C. § 16912

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 67 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009). · cites it 6× “Third, the Attorney General, acting under 42 U.S.C. §§ 16912 (b) and 16913(d) (directing the Attorney General to promulgate regulations and authorizing him "to specify the applicability of the requirements of this title to sex offenders convicted before the enactment of [SORNA] .”
United States v. Guzman, 591 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “Hall moved to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA: (1) does not apply in his case because neither New York nor Virginia have implemented the terms of SORNA as required by 42 U.S.C. § 16912 , and the United States Attorney General did not make SORNA retroactive; (2)…”
Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr. Servs. v. Doe, 94 A.3d 791 (Md. 2014). · cites it 6× “42 U.S.C. § 16912 (“Registry requirements for jurisdictions”); National Guidelines, 73 Fed.”
Reynolds v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 975 (2012). · cites it 2× “42 U. S. C. §§16912 (b), 16914(a)(7), (b)(7), 16919, 16941, 16945 (granting the Attorney General authority to administer various aspects of the Act).”
United States v. Stevenson, 676 F.3d 557 (6th Cir. 2012). · cites it 4× “” 42 U.S.C. § 16912 (b). On February 28, 2007, the Attorney General issued an interim rule making SORNA immediately effective to all sex offenders, including those convicted of the offense for which registration is required before SORNA’s enactment.”
United States v. Hatcher, 560 F.3d 222 (4th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C.A. § 16912 (a) (West 2008). Sex offenders are required to provide several types of information for inclusion in the sex offender registry, including their names and aliases, Social Security numbers, addresses of residences, names and addresses of places of employment,…”
United States v. Cain, 583 F.3d 408 (6th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 16912 (emphasis added). [1] In contrast to § 16912(b), the language of § 16913(d) is not that the Attorney General "shall issue," but rather "shall have the authority.”
Doe v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Neb. 2010). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 16912 , 16925. As also required by SORNA, 42 U.”
United States v. Billy Reynolds, 710 F.3d 498 (3rd Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 16912 ; 72 Fed. Reg. 8895 (describing the two main aspects of SORNA).”
United States v. Ditomasso, 552 F. Supp. 2d 233 (D.R.I. 2008). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. §§ 16912 , 16918, 16919. Rhode Island has not yet fully complied with these requirements.”
United States v. Lott, 750 F.3d 214 (2d Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “The notice proposing the guidelines specifically stated: “These proposed guidelines carry out a statutory directive to the Attorney General, in section 112(b) of SORNA ( 42 U.S.C. § 16912 (b)) to issue guidelines to interpret and implement SORNA.”
United States v. Howell, 552 F.3d 709 (8th Cir. 2009). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 16912 (a), 16925(a) (linking federal funding to the creation of a state sex offender registry).”
Show all 67 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.