42 U.S.C. § 16917

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2022 · leading case: United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009). · cites it 4× “§ 16913 (b), because he was released from prison on his underlying sex offense long before SORNA was enacted; (3) he could not have "knowingly" failed to register in accordance with SORNA because he was not specifically instructed of SORNA's requirements, as required by 42…”
United States v. Brown, 586 F.3d 1342 (11th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 16917 (a) (2009). However, Brown acknowledges that this subsection does not encompass sex offenders, like him, who have already served their sentences prior to SORNA’s enactment.”
United States v. Anthony Ross, 848 F.3d 1129 (D.C. Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 16917 (a); 73 Fed. Reg. at 38063–38064.”
United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir. 2009). “A provision of SORNA, 42 U.S.C. § 16917 , addresses notification of offenders.”
United States v. Jeffrey Stock, 685 F.3d 621 (6th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 16917 (b). Although this constitutional claim survived Stock’s guilty plea, the factual basis for it did not.”
United States v. Griffey, 589 F.3d 1363 (11th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “In Brown , this Court recognized that “[pjursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 16917 (a), an appropriate official must notify a sex offender of his duty to register before the defendant’s release from custody, or immediately after sentencing if the defendant is not in custody.”
United States v. Talada, 631 F. Supp. 2d 797 (S.D.W. Va 2009). · cites it 3× “) Under 42 U.S.C. § 16917 , the duty to notify sex offenders of registration requirements is as follows: (a) In general An appropriate official shall, shortly before release of the sex offender from custody, or, if the sex offender is not in custody, immediately after the…”
United States v. Joshua Elkins, 683 F.3d 1039 (9th Cir. 2012). “Elkins of his responsibilities to register in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 16917 and therefore a conviction under 18 U.”
United States v. Benevento, 633 F. Supp. 2d 1170 (D. Nev. 2009). · cites it 3× “He also claims he was not on notice of SORNA’s registration requirements because the Attorney General has not prescribed rules pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 16917 (b). Section 16917(b) mandates that “[t]he Attorney General shall prescribe rules for the notification of sex offenders…”
United States v. Gould, 526 F. Supp. 2d 538 (D. Maryland 2007). “The Government counters that Gould had notice of a duty to register from his obligations under Pennsylvania law.”
United States v. Waybright, 561 F. Supp. 2d 1154 (D. Mont. 2008). “Due Process Next Waybright maintains he had no duty to register under SORNA because the government failed to notify him of his obligations under the Act.”
United States v. Stinson, 507 F. Supp. 2d 560 (S.D.W. Va 2007). · cites it 2× “” 42 U.S.C. § 16917 (b). 4 It was not until February 28, 2007, however, that the Attorney General published the Interim Rule, making SORNA applicable to the defendant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.