42 U.S.C. § 16918
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 2007–2016 · leading case: State v. Petersen-Beard, 377 P.3d 1127 (Kan. 2016).
State v. Petersen-Beard, 377 P.3d 1127 (Kan. 2016). “' 42 U.S.C. §§ 16918 (a), 16920(b). And among SORNA's others mandates, an appropriate official must affirmatively distribute notice of an individual's sex offender status to 'each school and public housing agency' in the area where that sex offender resides.”
Doe v. Dep't of Pub. Saf. & Corr. Servs., 62 A.3d 123 (Md. 2013). “Maryland provides for online dissemination of certain registration information, not excluding the registrant’s photograph, CP § 11-717, as does SORNA, 42 U.S.C. § 16918 . SORNA requires that states provide a criminal penalty for a registrant’s failure to comply with these…”
Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 6 A.3d 763 (Conn. 2010). “§ 16915a (c) (setting forth same restriction on disclosure of offender’s Internet identifiers); 42 U.S.C. § 16918 (b) (mandating that each jurisdiction make all information in sex offender registry available to public but mandating following exemptions from public disclosure:…”
Doe v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Neb. 2010). “Compare 42 U.S.C. § 16918 (a) with 42 U.S.C. § 16918 (c).”
Kennedy v. Allera, 612 F.3d 261 (4th Cir. 2010). “” 42 U.S.C. § 16918 (a); see also Applicability of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 72 Fed.”
United States v. Madera, 474 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (M.D. Fla. 2007). “See 42 U.S.C. § 16918 . Each jurisdiction’s website is also required to include “all field search capabilities needed for full participation in the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website,” a website that shall be maintained by the Attorney General.”
United States v. Juv. Male, 670 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2012). “” 42 U.S.C. § 16918 (a). Because it is clear that the government’s public release of juvenile records authorized by SORNA would have been prohibited under the FJDA prior to the passage of SORNA, we find that the two statutes conflict.”
United States v. Madera, 528 F.3d 852 (11th Cir. 2008). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 16918 , 16920. Most pertinent to this case, SORNA also delineates how and when a sex offender should register under the Act.”
United States v. Under Seal, 709 F.3d 257 (4th Cir. 2013). “” 42 U.S.C. § 16918 (a). Because it is clear that the government’s public release of juvenile records authorized by SORNA would be prohibited under the FJDA, but for the passage of SORNA, we agree with Appellant that the two statutes conflict.”
United States v. W.B.H., 664 F.3d 848 (11th Cir. 2011). “42 U.S.C. § 16918 (f). W.B.H. attempts to distinguish Doe, arguing that records involving criminal offenses committed by Alabama youthful offenders are not made public, so disseminating information about them must be punitive.”
Standley v. Town of Woodfin, 650 S.E.2d 618 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007). “42 U.S.C. § 16918 (d) (Supp.2007). They must report information regarding sex offenders to the United States Attorney General, law enforcement agencies, school and public housing agencies, social services entities, and volunteer organizations in which contact with minors or…”
United States v. Ditomasso, 552 F. Supp. 2d 233 (D.R.I. 2008). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 16918 , 16925. But, the basis of this system is the states — and it is the states’ Megan’s Laws on which SORNA builds.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.