42 U.S.C. § 16971
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2007–2009 · leading case: United States v. Shields, 522 F. Supp. 2d 317 (D. Mass. 2007).
United States v. Shields, 522 F. Supp. 2d 317 (D. Mass. 2007). “See 42 U.S.C. § 16971 (a) (establishing grants to states “for the purpose of establishing, enhancing, or operating effective civil commitment programs for sexually dangerous persons”); H.”
United States v. Tom, 565 F.3d 497 (8th Cir. 2009). “42 U.S.C. § 16971 (a) establishes grants to states “for the purpose of establishing, enhancing, or operating effective civil commitment programs for sexually dangerous persons” which indicates that Congress intends the states rather than the federal government to have primary…”
United States v. Abregana, 574 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (D. Haw. 2008). “” 42 U.S.C. § 16971 (a). “[L]ike Section 4246, Section 4248 can be viewed as a ‘backup’ measure, designed to ensure that a dangerous individual does not slip through the cracks simply because he is in federal, as opposed to state, custody.”
United States v. Wilkinson, 626 F. Supp. 2d 184 (D. Mass. 2009). “Indeed, the Adam Walsh Act, in 42 U.S.C. § 16971 (a), provides for federal grants to the states for “establishing, enhancing and operating effective civil commitment programs for sexually dangerous persons.”
United States v. Roger Dean Tom (8th Cir. 2009). “42 U.S.C. § 16971 (a) establishes grants to states "for the purpose of establishing, enhancing, or operating effective civil commitment programs for sexually dangerous persons" which indicates that Congress intends the states rather than the federal government to have primary…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.