42 U.S.C. § 1715
Finality of Secretary’s decisions
The action of the Secretary in allowing or denying any payment under subchapter I shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact and not subject to review by any other official of the United States or by any court by mandamus or otherwise, and the Comptroller General is authorized and directed to allow credit in the accounts of any certifying or disbursing officer for payments in accordance with such action.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1971–2016 · leading case: Mark Munns v. John F. Kerry, 782 F.3d 402 (9th Cir. 2015).
Mark Munns v. John F. Kerry, 782 F.3d 402 (9th Cir. 2015). “Although this court does not have jurisdiction over the federal benefit program claims, nothing in this opinion precludes the family member plaintiffs from seeking relief under these federal statutes through the proper administrative procedures.”
In re Al-Nashiri, 791 F.3d 71 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “” (emphasis added)); 42 U.S.C. § 1715 (“The action of the Secretary [of Labor] in allowing or denying any payment under subchapter I of this chapter shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact and not subject to review by any other official of the United…”
Murray Energy Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 788 F.3d 330 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “”); 42 U.S.C. § 1715 (“The action of the Secretary [of Labor] .”
Lockhart v. Kenops, 927 F.2d 1028 (8th Cir. 1991). “…Freedom Act (AIRFA), 42 U.S.C. § 1996 , the Federal Land Exchange Acts, 16 U.S.C. §§ 485 , 486, 516, 521d, 555a; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1715 , 1716; 7 U.S.C. § 1011 , and the first and fifth amendments to the federal Constitution. The action sought declaratory and injunctive relief…”
Melancon v. Morrison-Knudsen Int'l Co., 329 F. Supp. 981 (W.D. La. 1971). “” 42 U.S.C.A. § 1715 . It is thus conclusively settled for this Court that plaintiff is entitled to compensation benefits under the War Risk Hazards Compensation Act.”
State of West Virginia v. EPA (D.C. Cir. 2015). “”); 42 U.S.C. § 1715 (“The action of the Secretary [of Labor] .”
State of West Virginia v. EPA (D.C. Cir. 2015). “”); 42 U.S.C. § 1715 (“The action of the Secretary [of Labor] .”
Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashir v. (D.C. Cir. 2015). “” (emphasis added)); 42 U.S.C. § 1715 (“The action of the Secretary [of Labor] in allowing or denying any payment under subchapter I of this chapter shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact and not subject to review by any other official of the United…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.