42 U.S.C. § 18084

Premium tax credit and cost-sharing reduction payments disregarded for Federal and federally-assisted programs

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of determining the eligibility of any individual for benefits or assistance, or the amount or extent of benefits or assistance, under any Federal program or under any State or local program financed in whole or in part with Federal funds—(1) any credit or refund allowed or made to any individual by reason of section 36B of title 26 (as added by section 1401) 11 See References in Text note below. shall not be taken into account as income and shall not be taken into account as resources for the month of receipt and the following 2 months; and(2) any cost-sharing reduction payment or advance payment of the credit allowed under such section 36B that is made under section 18071 or 18082 of this title shall be treated as made to the qualified health plan in which an individual is enrolled and not to that individual.(Pub. L. 111–148, title I, § 1415, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 237.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Section 1401, referred to in par. (1), means section 1401 of Pub. L. 111–148.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Zhu v. Kansas Dept. of Health & Env't (Kan. Ct. App. 2022).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Zhu v. Kansas Dept. of Health & Env't (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “But 42 U.S.C. § 18084 (2018) clarifies that the advance premium tax credit should be treated as having been made to the qualified health plan—BCBS here—and not to Zhu: "For purposes of determining the eligibility of any individual for benefits or assistance, or the amount or…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.