42 U.S.C. § 1973b

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 237 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1965–2022 · leading case: Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009).
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009). · cites it 15× “2 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (1976 ed.)); see also 446 U.”
City of Rome v. United States, 446 U.S. 156 (1980). · cites it 19× “Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires preclearance by the Attorney General or the United States District Court for the District of Columbia of any change in a *161 "standard, practice, or procedure with respect to voting," 42 U.”
United States v. Sheffield Bd. of Comm'rs, 435 U.S. 110 (1978). · cites it 16× “438 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973b (1970 ed., Supp. V), [2] obtain prior federal approval before changing any voting practice or procedure that was in effect on November 1, 1964.”
Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New York, 413 U.S. 345 (1973). · cites it 15× “438, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973b (a). [1] The appellants [2] seek review of *348 an order dated April 13, 1972, unaccompanied by any opinion, denying their motion to intervene [3] in a suit that had been instituted against the United States by *349 the State of New York, on…”
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). · cites it 20× “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
Shelby Cnty. v. Holder, 133 S. Ct. 2612 (2013). · cites it 6× “42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (2006 ed. and Supp.”
Hayden v. Pataki, 449 F.3d 305 (2d Cir. 2006). · cites it 12× “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), (c). And if the plaintiffs were, in fact, arguing that the Voting Rights Act erects a per se ban on felon disenfranchisement, I would readily join the majority.”
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Mukasey, 573 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2008). · cites it 20× “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b, 1973c. To obtain preclearance of a proposed change under section 5, covered jurisdictions may either submit the proposed change to the United States Attorney General or seek a declaratory judgment from a three-judge panel of this court.”
Shelby Cnty., Ala. v. Holder, 679 F.3d 848 (D.C. Cir. 2012). · cites it 14× “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), 1973c(a). In addition, jurisdictions not captured by section 4(b) but which nonetheless have serious, recent records of voting discrimination, may be "bailed in"— i.”
United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Carey, 430 U.S. 144 (1977). · cites it 6× “First, it is important to recall that the Attorney General's oversight focuses upon jurisdictions whose prior practices exhibited the purpose or effect of infringing the right to vote on account of race, thereby triggering § 4 of the Act, 42 U. S. C. § 1973b (1970 ed. and Supp.…”
Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1968). · cites it 8× “42 U. S. C. § 1973b (a) (1964 ed., Supp. I).”
Simmons v. Galvin, 575 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2009). · cites it 6× “at 401-02 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(£), 19731(c)(3)). Nothing in those amendments indicated any intent to broaden the VRA to permit suits against state laws disenfranchising incarcerated felons.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a) — 39 cases
Shelby Cnty. v. Holder, 133 S. Ct. 2612 (2013). “42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (2006 ed. and Supp.”
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009). “2 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (1976 ed.)); see also 446 U.”
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
Hayden v. Pataki, 449 F.3d 305 (2d Cir. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), (c). And if the plaintiffs were, in fact, arguing that the Voting Rights Act erects a per se ban on felon disenfranchisement, I would readily join the majority.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(1) — 8 cases
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009). “2 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (1976 ed.)); see also 446 U.”
Reno v. Bossier Par. Sch. Bd., 528 U.S. 320 (2000).
Hayden v. Pataki, 449 F.3d 305 (2d Cir. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), (c). And if the plaintiffs were, in fact, arguing that the Voting Rights Act erects a per se ban on felon disenfranchisement, I would readily join the majority.”
Shelby Cnty., Ala. v. Holder, 679 F.3d 848 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), 1973c(a). In addition, jurisdictions not captured by section 4(b) but which nonetheless have serious, recent records of voting discrimination, may be "bailed in"— i.”
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(1)(A) — 5 cases
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009). “2 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (1976 ed.)); see also 446 U.”
Simmons v. Galvin, 575 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2009). “at 401-02 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(£), 19731(c)(3)). Nothing in those amendments indicated any intent to broaden the VRA to permit suits against state laws disenfranchising incarcerated felons.”
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
Laroque v. Holder (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(1)(A)(F) — 1 case
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. One v. Mukasey, 557 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2008).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(1)(D) — 2 cases
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(1)(E) — 2 cases
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(1)(F)(iii) — 1 case
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(2) — 3 cases
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
State of Arizona v. Holder, 839 F. Supp. 2d 36 (D.D.C. 2012).
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. One v. Mukasey, 557 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2008).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(2)(4) — 1 case
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Mukasey, 573 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2008). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b, 1973c. To obtain preclearance of a proposed change under section 5, covered jurisdictions may either submit the proposed change to the United States Attorney General or seek a declaratory judgment from a three-judge panel of this court.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(3) — 3 cases
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009). “2 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (1976 ed.)); see also 446 U.”
City of Tucson v. State, 273 P.3d 624 (Ariz. 2012).
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(4) — 2 cases
State of New Hampshire v. Holder, 293 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2013).
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(5) — 9 cases
Shelby Cnty., Ala. v. Holder, 679 F.3d 848 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), 1973c(a). In addition, jurisdictions not captured by section 4(b) but which nonetheless have serious, recent records of voting discrimination, may be "bailed in"— i.”
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Mukasey, 573 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2008). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b, 1973c. To obtain preclearance of a proposed change under section 5, covered jurisdictions may either submit the proposed change to the United States Attorney General or seek a declaratory judgment from a three-judge panel of this court.”
Castro Cnty., Texas v. Joe Crespin, 101 F.3d 121 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(7) — 6 cases
Shelby Cnty. v. Holder, 133 S. Ct. 2612 (2013). “42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (2006 ed. and Supp.”
Shaw v. Hunt, 861 F. Supp. 408 (E.D.N.C. 1994).
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Mukasey, 573 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2008). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b, 1973c. To obtain preclearance of a proposed change under section 5, covered jurisdictions may either submit the proposed change to the United States Attorney General or seek a declaratory judgment from a three-judge panel of this court.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(8) — 6 cases
Shelby Cnty. v. Holder, 133 S. Ct. 2612 (2013). “42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (2006 ed. and Supp.”
Riley v. Kennedy, 553 U.S. 406 (2008).
Hayden v. Pataki, 449 F.3d 305 (2d Cir. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), (c). And if the plaintiffs were, in fact, arguing that the Voting Rights Act erects a per se ban on felon disenfranchisement, I would readily join the majority.”
Johnson v. Miller, 864 F. Supp. 1354 (S.D. Ga. 1994).
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(9) — 1 case
State of New Hampshire v. Holder, 293 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2013).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(l) — 10 cases
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009). “2 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (1976 ed.)); see also 446 U.”
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Mukasey, 573 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2008). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b, 1973c. To obtain preclearance of a proposed change under section 5, covered jurisdictions may either submit the proposed change to the United States Attorney General or seek a declaratory judgment from a three-judge panel of this court.”
Shelby Cnty., Ala. v. Holder, 679 F.3d 848 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), 1973c(a). In addition, jurisdictions not captured by section 4(b) but which nonetheless have serious, recent records of voting discrimination, may be "bailed in"— i.”
Hayden v. Pataki, 449 F.3d 305 (2d Cir. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), (c). And if the plaintiffs were, in fact, arguing that the Voting Rights Act erects a per se ban on felon disenfranchisement, I would readily join the majority.”
Harris v. Arizona Indep. Redistricting Comm'n, 993 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (D. Ariz. 2014).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(l)(A) — 6 cases
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009). “2 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (1976 ed.)); see also 446 U.”
Simmons v. Galvin, 575 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2009). “at 401-02 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(£), 19731(c)(3)). Nothing in those amendments indicated any intent to broaden the VRA to permit suits against state laws disenfranchising incarcerated felons.”
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Mukasey, 573 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2008). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b, 1973c. To obtain preclearance of a proposed change under section 5, covered jurisdictions may either submit the proposed change to the United States Attorney General or seek a declaratory judgment from a three-judge panel of this court.”
LaRoque v. Holder, 755 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2010).
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(l)(B) — 1 case
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(l)(C) — 1 case
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(l)(D) — 1 case
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(l)(E) — 2 cases
Harris v. Arizona Indep. Redistricting Comm'n, 993 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (D. Ariz. 2014).
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(l)(F) — 2 cases
City of Tucson v. State, 273 P.3d 624 (Ariz. 2012).
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(l)(F)(i) — 2 cases
State of Ariz. v. Reno, 887 F. Supp. 318 (D.D.C. 1995).
City of Kings Mountain v. Holder, 746 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(b) — 63 cases
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009). “2 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §1973b(a) (1976 ed.)); see also 446 U.”
United States v. Hays, 515 U.S. 737 (1995).
Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900 (1995).
Holder v. Hall, 512 U.S. 874 (1994).
Shelby Cnty., Ala. v. Holder, 679 F.3d 848 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), 1973c(a). In addition, jurisdictions not captured by section 4(b) but which nonetheless have serious, recent records of voting discrimination, may be "bailed in"— i.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(b)(l) — 1 case
Page v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, 58 F. Supp. 3d 533 (E.D. Va. 2014).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(c) — 17 cases
Hayden v. Pataki, 449 F.3d 305 (2d Cir. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), (c). And if the plaintiffs were, in fact, arguing that the Voting Rights Act erects a per se ban on felon disenfranchisement, I would readily join the majority.”
Simmons v. Galvin, 575 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2009). “at 401-02 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(£), 19731(c)(3)). Nothing in those amendments indicated any intent to broaden the VRA to permit suits against state laws disenfranchising incarcerated felons.”
City of Rome, Ga. v. United States, 472 F. Supp. 221 (D.D.C. 1979).
Presley v. Etowah Cnty. Comm'n, 502 U.S. 491 (1992).
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Mukasey, 573 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2008). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b, 1973c. To obtain preclearance of a proposed change under section 5, covered jurisdictions may either submit the proposed change to the United States Attorney General or seek a declaratory judgment from a three-judge panel of this court.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(d) — 2 cases
Gaston Cnty. v. United States, 288 F. Supp. 678 (D.D.C. 1968).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(e) — 28 cases
Carhart v. Ashcroft, 331 F. Supp. 2d 805 (D. Neb. 2004).
United States v. Marengo Cnty. Comm'n, 731 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1984).
United States v. Berks Cnty., Pa., 250 F. Supp. 2d 525 (E.D. Pa. 2003).
Presley v. Etowah Cnty. Comm'n, 502 U.S. 491 (1992).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(e)(1) — 1 case
Puerto Rican Org. for Political Action v. Kusper, 350 F. Supp. 606 (N.D. Ill. 1972).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(e)(2) — 1 case
Kuri v. Edelman, 491 F.2d 684 (7th Cir. 1974).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(f) — 10 cases
Simmons v. Galvin, 575 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2009). “at 401-02 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(£), 19731(c)(3)). Nothing in those amendments indicated any intent to broaden the VRA to permit suits against state laws disenfranchising incarcerated felons.”
United States v. Uvalde Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 625 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1980).
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “7, 1965); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973b, § 1973c, § 1973l (c)(2); Compl.”
In Re Senate Jt. Resolution 2G, 597 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1992).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(f)(1) — 3 cases
Chisom v. Roemer, 501 U.S. 380 (1991).
United States v. Berks Cnty., Pa., 250 F. Supp. 2d 525 (E.D. Pa. 2003).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(f)(1988) — 1 case
Nixon v. Kent Cnty., 76 F.3d 1381 (6th Cir. 1996).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(f)(2) — 32 cases
In Re Sanchez, 81 S.W.3d 794 (Tex. 2002).
In Re Legislative Districting of the State, 805 A.2d 292 (Md. 2002).
United States v. Uvalde Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 625 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1980).
Martinez v. Bush, 234 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (S.D. Fla. 2002).
Wilson v. Eu, 823 P.2d 545 (Cal. 1992).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(f)(2)(1988) — 1 case
In re Stephan, 836 P.2d 574 (Kan. 1992).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(f)(3) — 9 cases
Shelby Cnty., Ala. v. Holder, 679 F.3d 848 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(a), 1973c(a). In addition, jurisdictions not captured by section 4(b) but which nonetheless have serious, recent records of voting discrimination, may be "bailed in"— i.”
Florida v. United States, 885 F. Supp. 2d 299 (D.D.C. 2012).
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Mukasey, 573 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2008). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b, 1973c. To obtain preclearance of a proposed change under section 5, covered jurisdictions may either submit the proposed change to the United States Attorney General or seek a declaratory judgment from a three-judge panel of this court.”
State of Texas v. Holder, 888 F. Supp. 2d 113 (D.D.C. 2012).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(f)(4) — 10 cases
Montero v. Meyer, 861 F.2d 603 (10th Cir. 1988).
Delgado v. Smith, 861 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir. 1988).
Montero v. Meyer, 795 P.2d 242 (Colo. 1990).
Montero v. Meyer, 696 F. Supp. 540 (D. Colo. 1988).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(f)(l) — 11 cases
Chisom v. Roemer, 501 U.S. 380 (1991).
United States v. Uvalde Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 625 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1980).
Nixon v. Kent Cnty., 76 F.3d 1381 (6th Cir. 1996).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(l)(2) — 1 case
Burton v. City of Belle Glade, 178 F.3d 1175 (11th Cir. 1999).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.