42 U.S.C. § 1974b

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1962–2016 · leading case: Proj. Vote, Inc. v. Kemp, 208 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (N.D. Ga. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Proj. Vote, Inc. v. Kemp, 208 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (N.D. Ga. 2016). · cites it 2× “at 734-35 (citing 42 U.S.C. §§ 1974b, 1974c 38 ). If redaction of certain sensitive information is not permitted, Section 8(i) would effectively provide any individual unfettered access to sensitive information the Civil Rights Act of 1960 prevents even the Attorney General from…”

True the Vote v. Hosemann, 43 F. Supp. 3d 693 (S.D. Miss. 2014). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1974b, 1974c. Under Plaintiffs’ interpretation of the NVRA Public Disclosure Provision, however, any individual may simply request, orally or in writing, these documents from the States and Counties and are entitled to them in unredacted form.”

Preston P. Coleman, Circuit Clerk & Registrar of Lauderdale Cnty., Mississippi v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney Gen. of the United States, 313 F.2d 867 (5th Cir. 1963). “7767): “The language added by the House Judiciary Committee in section 303 that the Attorney General’s demand ‘contain a statement of the basis and the purpose therefor’ means only that the Attorney General identify in a general way the reasons for his demand.”

Kennedy v. Bruce, 298 F.2d 860 (5th Cir. 1962). “They both arose following action by the then Acting Assistant Attorney General of the United States taken on May 9, 1960, pursuant to Section 303 of the Civil Rights Act of 1960, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1974b. On this date the federal official wrote to the Board of Registrars of Wilcox…”

Kennedy v. Owen, 321 F.2d 116 (5th Cir. 1963). “) 42 U.S.C.A. § 1974b (Supp.1962). So long as the demand was addressed to and received by the proper person, it is immaterial that he was described as “Circuit Clerk” and was not also described as “Registrar.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.