U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 20A— CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION

42 U.S.C. § 1975d

Termination

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall terminate on September 30, 1996.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1959–2002 · leading case: Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420 (1960).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420 (1960). · cites it 3× “636 , 42 U. S. C. § 1975d (f). [6] The role of private citizens in depriving Negroes of their right to vote was one of the questions involved in United States v.”
United States v. Joseph F. O'Neill & Frank A. Scafidi, 619 F.2d 222 (3rd Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 1975d(f). If any person refuses to obey the subpoenas, the Commission may apply to a United States district court for an enforcement order.”
United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Klickitat Cnty., State of Washington, & James Starr, 795 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1986). “§ 1971 (f) (1982) (“the court before which [a person charged with contempt under 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(g) ] is cited or tried .”
George v. Ishimaru, 849 F. Supp. 68 (D.D.C. 1994). · cites it 2× “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(a)(l). 7. When President Clinton took office, the staff director’s position was vacant.”
Larche v. Hannah, 177 F. Supp. 816 (W.D. La. 1959). · cites it 2× “The Commission assumed that they had the power to so do. On their own, they adopted a rule denying to the parties investigated the right of cross-examination.”
United States v. Wilson, Victoria, 290 F.3d 347 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “The 1994 Act provided for the Commission to terminate on September 30, 1996, 42 U.S.C. § 1975d, however, it has again continued to operate pursuant to annual appropriations.”
Pina v. City of East Providence, 492 F. Supp. 1240 (D.R.I. 1980). “The Committee was organized under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(c) (1974). Although the study conducted by the Committee was limited, certain problem areas were identified, and the study observed, “Blacks are underrepresented, even at the lower salary levels.”
Larche v. Hannah, 176 F. Supp. 791 (W.D. La. 1959). “Practically, however, another and different aspect is presented, for under the Civil Rights Commission Act they can refuse to produce the records, without penalties of any kind, and the only recourse the Commission would have would be to request the Attorney General of the…”
Presidential Auth. to Require the Resignations of Members of the Civil Rights Comm'n (OLC 1972). “42 U.S.C. § 1975d(a) (1970). The Commission’s budget requests are subject to OMB approval.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(a) — 1 case
Presidential Auth. to Require the Resignations of Members of the Civil Rights Comm'n (OLC 1972). “42 U.S.C. § 1975d(a) (1970). The Commission’s budget requests are subject to OMB approval.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(a)(l) — 1 case
George v. Ishimaru, 849 F. Supp. 68 (D.D.C. 1994). “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(a)(l). 7. When President Clinton took office, the staff director’s position was vacant.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(c) — 1 case
Pina v. City of East Providence, 492 F. Supp. 1240 (D.R.I. 1980). “The Committee was organized under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(c) (1974). Although the study conducted by the Committee was limited, certain problem areas were identified, and the study observed, “Blacks are underrepresented, even at the lower salary levels.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(f) — 1 case
United States v. Joseph F. O'Neill & Frank A. Scafidi, 619 F.2d 222 (3rd Cir. 1980). “42 U.S.C. § 1975d(f). If any person refuses to obey the subpoenas, the Commission may apply to a United States district court for an enforcement order.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(g) — 3 cases
United States v. Joseph F. O'Neill & Frank A. Scafidi, 619 F.2d 222 (3rd Cir. 1980). “42 U.S.C. § 1975d(f). If any person refuses to obey the subpoenas, the Commission may apply to a United States district court for an enforcement order.”
United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Klickitat Cnty., State of Washington, & James Starr, 795 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1986). “§ 1971 (f) (1982) (“the court before which [a person charged with contempt under 42 U.S.C. § 1975d(g) ] is cited or tried .”
Larche v. Hannah, 176 F. Supp. 791 (W.D. La. 1959). “Practically, however, another and different aspect is presented, for under the Civil Rights Commission Act they can refuse to produce the records, without penalties of any kind, and the only recourse the Commission would have would be to request the Attorney General of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.