Notes of Decisions
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 590 U.S. 644 (2020).
· cites it 3× “§2000c(b) (Civil Rights; Public Edu- cation; Definitions) 42 U. S. C. §2000c–6(a)(2) (Civil Rights; Public Education; Civil Actions by the Attorney Gen- eral) 42 U.”
Bob Jones Univ. v. United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983).
· cites it 2× “241, 42 U. S. C. §§ 2000c, 2000c-6, 2000d, clearly expressed its agreement that racial discrimination in education violates a fundamental public policy.”
Sch. Comm. of Springfield v. Bd. of Educ., 287 N.E.2d 438 (Mass. 1972).
· cites it 3× “By virtue of the racial imbalance law, it is the policy of this State “to encourage all school committees to adopt as educational objectives the promotion of racial balance and the correction of existing racial imbalance in the public schools.”
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1 (1971).
“The school authorities argue that the equity powers of federal district courts have been limited by Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U. S. C. § 2000c. The language and the history of Title IV show that it was enacted not to limit but to define the role of the Federal…”
Green v. Cnty. Sch. Bd. of New Kent Cnty., 391 U.S. 430 (1968).
“In Title VI Congress declared that “No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied *434 the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal…”
Green v. Connally, 330 F. Supp. 1150 (D.D.C. 1971).
· cites it 2× “pplying the prohibition against state school segregation to the Federal Government through the Fifth Amendment, the Supreme Court declared, “Segregation in public education is not reasonably related to any proper governmental objective * * The national policy against support for…”
Olson v. Bd. of Ed. of U. Free Sch. Dist. No. 12, Malverne, NY, 250 F. Supp. 1000 (E.D.N.Y 1966).
· cites it 4× “§ 1343 (3), upon the ground that the action of the Commissioner violates the plaintiff’s rights under the Fourteenth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.A. § 2000c et seq.), seeking both a preliminary and a permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from…”
Cheryl Slingland v. Postmaster Gen., 542 F. App'x 189 (3d Cir. 2013).
“She alleged that the Postal Service violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000c et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.”
42 U.S.C. § 2000c(a)(2)(C): 1 case
42 U.S.C. § 2000c(a)(l): 1 case
42 U.S.C. § 2000c(a)(l)(A): 1 case
42 U.S.C. § 2000c(b): 14 cases
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 590 U.S. 644 (2020).
“§2000c(b) (Civil Rights; Public Edu- cation; Definitions) 42 U. S. C. §2000c–6(a)(2) (Civil Rights; Public Education; Civil Actions by the Attorney Gen- eral) 42 U.”
42 U.S.C. § 2000c(c): 3 cases
42 U.S.C. § 2000c(d): 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.