42 U.S.C. § 223
SOUTHEAST INTERSTATE LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPACT.
“In accordance with section 4(a)(2) of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 2021d(a)(2)), the consent of the Congress is hereby given to the States of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia to enter into the Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact. Such compact is substantially as follows: [Text of compact appears at 99 Stat. 1871; 103 Stat. 1289.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1970–2025 · leading case: Natalie F. Smith, Widow of Dennis A. Smith, Deceased v. Patricia Harris, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 644 F.2d 985 (3rd Cir. 1981).
Natalie F. Smith, Widow of Dennis A. Smith, Deceased v. Patricia Harris, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 644 F.2d 985 (3rd Cir. 1981). “Smith claims he was entitled to disability insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 223 (d) for a disability period under 42 U.”
Poindexter v. Bonsukan, 145 F. Supp. 2d 800 (E.D. Tex. 2001). “Kakhdir to be federal employees, see 42 U.S.C. § 223 (g)-(n), Defendant USA was substituted as the proper defendant.”
Gonzalez v. United States, 284 F.3d 281 (1st Cir. 2002). “1 Second, the plaintiff contends that the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled because she was unaware that the defendants were for purposes of the FTCA federal employees, 42 U.S.C. § 223 (a), (g), necessitating her compliance with the two-year statute of…”
Vernell Parks v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Sec'y of Health & Human Resources, Defendant, 614 F.2d 83 (5th Cir. 1980). “§ 405 (g), and also contends the court erred by ordering payments without taking into consideration the five-month waiting period for entitlement to payments contained in 42 U.S.C. § 223 (d)(3). We need not labor these points, however, since the Secretary’s third contention —…”
Vincent Howell v. Richard S. Schweiker, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 699 F.2d 524 (11th Cir. 1983). “42 U.S.C. § 223 (1976). The ALJ concluded that Tookes retained the residual functional capacity to perform a wide range of activities consistent with his occupational background.”
Jasper W. Knox v. Robert H. Finch, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, United States of Am., 427 F.2d 919 (5th Cir. 1970). “See Section 223 (d) (1) (A) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 223 (d) (1) (A). Knox was 52 years of age in April 1965, the date of his alleged disability.”
Lucinda J. Sullivan v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare,defendant-Appellee, 493 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1974). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 223 (d)(2)(B) & (d)(5). 3 This is an area where administrative expertise should be accorded great weight.”
Hendrix v. Finch, 310 F. Supp. 513 (D.S.C. 1970). “His impression was that plaintiff had hypertensive arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and he recommended antihypertensive drugs. In March 1969 Dr.”
Namin (D. Utah 2025). “54 In Claim Four, Plaintiff asserts Defendant violated 42 U.S.C. § 223 and 18 U.S.C. § 875 by sending a text message threatening to kill Plaintiff and his fiancé if they did not “drop [a] lawsuit” against Defendant in California.”
Howard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (S.D. Ohio 2022). “467, 470 (1986); see 42 U.S.C. §§ 223 (d), 1382(a). The term “disability” encompasses “any medically determinable physical or mental impairment” that precludes an applicant from performing “substantial gainful activity.”
Paul H. v. Colvin (D.R.I. 2025). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 223 (d)(2)(C); 1382(a)(3)(J).”
Cockrell v. Saul (D. Minnesota 2020). “) Cockrell claims that he is disabled under 42 U.S.C. § 223 (d). (Admin R. at 18.) To be entitled to child’s insurance benefits on the earnings record of a parent, a claimant over the age of eighteen must have a disability that began before he turned 22 years old.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 223(a) — 1 case
Totten v. Scaife (S.D.W. Va 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.