42 U.S.C. § 227
NORTHEAST INTERSTATE LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPACT.
“In accordance with section 4(a)(2) of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act [42 U.S.C. 2021d(a)(2)], the consent of the Congress is hereby given to the States of Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland to enter into the Northeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact. Such compact is substantially as follows: [Text of compact appears at 99 Stat. 1910.].”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 51
cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc., 847 F.3d 92 (2d Cir. 2017).
Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc., 847 F.3d 92 (2d Cir. 2017). “I agree fully that the Complaint 3 plausibly states a claim under 42 U.S.C. §§ 227 (b)(1)(C) and (a)(5), as elucidated 4 by the 2006 Rule promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC 5 or the Commission), 71 Fed.”
Johansen v. HomeAdvisor, Inc., 218 F. Supp. 3d 577 (S.D. Ohio 2016). “— worked in tandem to violate the Telephone Consumer Privacy Act of 1991 (“TCPA”), codified at 42 U.S.C. § 227 , by placing telephone calls to a number that he listed on the National Do Not Call Registry.”
King v. Time Warner Cable Inc., 894 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 2018). “" 42 U.S.C. § 227 (a)(1). Aggrieved parties may bring suit to recover a minimum of $500 per violation, which sum can be trebled at the court's discretion "[i]f the court finds that the defendant willfully or knowingly violated" the statute.”
Victory Processing, LLC v. Tim Fox, 937 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2019). “The federal government passed the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in 1991 (“TCPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 227 , while states followed with their own enactments for addressing the problems caused by robocalls.”
Helping Hand Caregivers, Ltd. v. Darden Restaurants, Inc., 900 F.3d 884 (7th Cir. 2018). “; 42 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(1)(C). The court held that by its language, therefore, the statute requires that a defendant must "send" an advertisement, and the common meaning of send is either to cause to be conveyed or to dispatch.”
Jose Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald Co., 768 F.3d 871 (9th Cir. 2014). “1995) (holding that the TCPA’s treatment of commercial facsimile transmissions, 42 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(1)(C), is a constitutionally permitted content-based restriction).”
Richard Fischbein v. Olson Rsch. Grp. Inc, 959 F.3d 559 (3rd Cir. 2020). “” 42 U.S.C. § 227 (a)(5). Armed with that statutory text, we have everything we need to decide this case.”
Snyder v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 258 F. Supp. 3d 893 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “See 42 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3). Thus Congress seems to have determined that an award of statutory damages on its own would be sufficient to both compensate plaintiffs and deter future violations.”
Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. A-S Medication Solutions LLC, 324 F. Supp. 3d 973 (E.D. Ill. 2018). “" 42 U.S.C. § 227 (a)(5), (b)(1)(C). PHI has moved for summary judgment on the defendants' liability, which it separates into four issues: (1) whether the fax is an advertisement, as defined by the TCPA; (2) whether A-S Solutions and Hoff are senders of the fax; (3) whether the…”
US Fax Law Ctr., Inc. v. Henry Schein, Inc., 205 P.3d 512 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009). “” 42 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3). This language strongly suggests that those laws and rules of the state will govern when such an action is brought in the state court.”
Condon v. Off. Depot, Inc., 855 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). “See 42 U.S.C. § 227 (c)(5) (stating that persons "may, if otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of a State, bring [an action] in an appropriate court of that State").”
Lowe v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 233 F. Supp. 3d 636 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “Plaintiffs’ claims arise under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 42 U.S.C. § 227 et seq., and the Illinois Automatic Telephone Dialers Act (ATDA), 815 Ill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.