42 U.S.C. § 2949
Repealed. Pub. L. 93–644, § 9(c)(6), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2314
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1972–1974 · leading case: People of Enewetak v. Laird, 353 F. Supp. 811 (D. Haw. 1973).
People of Enewetak v. Laird, 353 F. Supp. 811 (D. Haw. 1973). “1972) (Disaster Relief Assistance)-; 42 U.S.C. § 2949 (Supp.1972) (Economic Opportunity Programs) ; 20 U.”
Ray Baillie Trash Hauling, Inc. v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Adm'r, Small Bus. Admin., 477 F.2d 696 (5th Cir. 1973). “42 U.S.C. § 2949 (2). This section, however, clearly applies to grants in kind and does not preclude awards of subcontracts for the performance of services.”
Caribtow Corp. v. Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 493 F.2d 1064 (1st Cir. 1974). “§ 136; Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2949 . See also Report of United States — Puerto Rico Commission, supra at 42.”
Fortec Constructors v. Kleppe, 350 F. Supp. 171 (D.D.C. 1972). “42 U.S.C. § 2949 (2). Finally, they argue that 8(a) as designed and as operated discriminates on the grounds of race or national origin, thus violating the fifth amendment and federal civil rights law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.